Thomas Fabbiano vs Jimmy Wang — Suzhou CH Quarter-final

Suzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA4
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 October 2015
hard
TPE
Jimmy Wang
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Fabbiano T.
6-7 6-3 6-3
Wang J.
Fabbiano T.
610662
Wang J.
712331

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Jimmy Wang 6-7 6-3 6-3 in the Suzhou CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jimmy Wang came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Jimmy Wang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-06-23WimbledonQ1grassJimmy Wang2-6 6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Wang J.

Wang J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Serve advantage — Wang J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Wang J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 79). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Wang J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
36
Break points saved·Dominant
81
55
Break points won·Clear edge
16
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
28
63
Tiebreaks·Even
44
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sela D.[2]
Pecotic M.
6-11-0
Semi-finals
Pecotic M.
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Sela D.[2]
Fabbiano T.[4]
6-11-66-4
Quarter-finals
Pecotic M.
Lee D.
5-76-47-5
Bai Y.
Moriya H.[8]
6-46-4
Fabbiano T.[4]
Wang J.
6-7106-36-3
Sela D.[2]
Langer N.
6-36-3
R16
Bai Y.
Zhang Z.
6-746-16-4
Moriya H.[8]
Weintraub A.
2-67-666-4
Pecotic M.
Zopp J.[3]
6-36-4
Lee D.
Lamasine T.[7]
3-66-06-1
Wang J.
Zhang Z.[6]
2-66-36-3
Fabbiano T.[4]
Vorster T.
6-36-4
Langer N.
Yang T.
6-13-66-2
Sela D.[2]
Rochette L.
6-16-0
R32
Bai Y.
Lu Y.[1]
3-1
Zhang Z.
Mektic N.
7-646-4
Moriya H.[8]
Zhou S.
6-26-2
Zopp J.[3]
Cipolla F.
6-36-3
Pecotic M.
Skugor F.
1-67-656-3
Lee D.
Wu D.
7-656-4
Weintraub A.
He Y.
6-36-4
Lamasine T.[7]
Ghedin R.
6-16-0
Zhang Z.[6]
Masur D.
7-56-2
Wang J.
Gao X.
3-66-26-1
Vorster T.
Ning Y.
6-37-5
Fabbiano T.[4]
Molchanov D.
4-66-17-64
Langer N.
Gojowczyk P.[5]
6-36-4
Yang T.
Cao Z.
7-646-3
Rochette L.
Ignatik U.
3-66-36-1
Sela D.[2]
Sun F.
6-16-1