Amir Weintraub vs Zhizhen Zhang — Ningbo CH Round of 32

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 October 2015
hard
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN
Zhizhen Zhang
#156ATP
1682ELO
1642Hard ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWLW
Weintraub A.
7-5 6-0
Zhang Z.
Weintraub A.
762
Zhang Z.
500

Amir Weintraub defeated Zhizhen Zhang 7-5 6-0 in the Ningbo CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Weintraub A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Zhang Z.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Serve advantage — Zhang Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Weintraub A.Zhang Z.
—
Serve
24
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Weintraub A.Zhang Z.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.5
6.9
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weintraub A.Zhang Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
56
Break points saved·Dominant
45
94
Break points won·Clear edge
29
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
35
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
60
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Weintraub A.Zhang Z.
Freshness·
—
86

Zhang Z.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Lu Y.[1]
Zopp J.[6]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[1]
Gojowczyk P.[7]
7-636-3
Zopp J.[6]
Skugor F.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Skugor F.
Masur D.
7-666-0
Lu Y.[1]
Fabbiano T.[8]
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Thompson J.
6-46-4
Zopp J.[6]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
R16
Lu Y.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-27-5
Fabbiano T.[8]
Langer N.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
He Y.
6-16-4
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Moriya H.
7-686-1
Masur D.
Ignatik U.
7-656-756-3
Skugor F.
Cipolla F.
3-66-17-5
Zopp J.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[2]
Mektic N.
6-746-46-2
R32
Moriya H.
Ghedin R.
4-1
Skugor F.
Molchanov D.
6-46-0
Zopp J.[6]
Fallert F.
6-16-1
Mektic N.
Li Y.
6-27-5
Thompson J.
Sela D.[3]
3-66-47-63
Cipolla F.
Soeda G.[4]
6-23-66-1
Lu Y.[1]
Vorster T.
6-36-2
Weintraub A.
Zhang Z.
7-56-0
Langer N.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[8]
Qiu Z.
6-06-1
He Y.
Niki T.
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Sun F.
6-26-1
Masur D.
Nishioka Y.[5]
6-16-2
Ignatik U.
Wu D.
3-66-16-4
Pecotic M.
Bai Y.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0