Rogerio Dutra Silva vs Horacio Zeballos — Santiago CH Final
Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 October 2015
clay
Dutra Silva R.7-5 3-6 7-5
Zeballos H.
Dutra Silva R.
7372
Zeballos H.
5651
Rogerio Dutra Silva defeated Horacio Zeballos 7-5 3-6 7-5 in the Santiago CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Horacio Zeballos came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Rogerio Dutra Silva claimed a first win over Horacio Zeballos in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.
Key context
- Match story: Rogerio Dutra Silva closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 7–5.
Head to head
0–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-26 | Sao Paulo | QF | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 |
| 2017-07-31 | Kitzbuhel | R32 | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 2-6 7-6(11) 7-6(4) |
| 2017-04-10 | Houston | R32 | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-2 7-5 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Dutra Silva R.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
41
45
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
89
Break points won·Slight edge
27
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
49
57
Tiebreaks·Even
59
58
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.[4]
Samper Montana J.
4-66-26-4
Clezar G.
Gonzalez A.[2]
6-16-1
Zeballos H.
Berlocq C.[5]
7-57-65
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Gonzalez M.
6-30-66-3
Quarter-finals
Samper Montana J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Zampieri C.
2-66-36-2
Clezar G.
Gonzalez M.[3]
6-46-2
Gonzalez A.[2]
Londero J.
1-67-636-2
Zeballos H.
Elias G.
7-643-67-64
Gonzalez M.
Ghem A.[7]
6-44-66-4
Berlocq C.[5]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-36-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Souza J.[4]
4-66-37-66
R16
Samper Montana J.
Jarry N.
6-16-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Olivo R.[8]
6-26-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Saez J.
6-36-4
Zampieri C.
Zeballos H.[5]
6-45-76-4
Clezar G.
Arguello F.[6]
6-36-3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
6-35-76-4
Londero J.
Robert S.
6-16-2
Gonzalez A.[2]
Malla B.
6-46-2
Gonzalez M.
Schwartzman D.[1]
6-41-0
Elias G.
Monteiro T.
2-66-36-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Escobar G.
6-46-4
Ghem A.[7]
Bahamonde F.
6-46-2
Berlocq C.[5]
Lama G.
6-14-66-3
Souza J.[4]
Saez J.
6-25-77-65
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Coppejans K.[3]
5-76-36-2
Zeballos H.
Gonzalez A.[2]
7-616-2
R32
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
6-34-66-4
Robert S.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[7]
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Lama G.
6-35-76-2
Jarry N.
Dutra Silva R.
4-66-36-1
Zampieri C.
Collarini A.
7-56-767-64
Gonzalez A.[2]
De Paula F.
6-46-4
Saez J.
Garin C.
6-46-4
Zeballos H.[5]
Aguilar J.
7-656-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Cachin P.
6-36-4
Samper Montana J.
Heras P.
6-33-66-4
Olivo R.[8]
Hocevar R.
6-40-66-4
Arguello F.[6]
Pella G.
6-26-3
Clezar G.
Hernandez J.
6-46-2
Lapentti G.
Molteni A.
6-36-2
Londero J.
Quinzi G.
6-46-4
Malla B.
Rivera Aranguiz G.
7-666-786-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Linzer M.
1-2
Schwartzman D.[1]
Samper Montana J.
3-66-17-63
Gonzalez M.
Lagos V.
6-16-2
Bahamonde F.
Martin A.
6-16-3
Ghem A.[7]
Michon A.
3-66-46-1
Souza J.[4]
Garin C.
6-36-4
Escobar G.
Kicker N.
7-666-756-4
Berlocq C.[5]
Pereira J.
6-47-63
Lama G.
Lindell C.
6-36-4
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Malla B.
6-46-2
Coppejans K.[3]
Trungelliti M.
6-47-64
Monteiro T.
Bagnis F.[6]
7-6104-66-2
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.
6-756-46-1
Zeballos H.
Clezar G.
6-756-46-4
Gonzalez A.[2]
Severino C.
6-16-1
Saez J.
Romboli F.
6-17-5