Daniel Masur vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Ningbo CH Round of 16

Ningbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 19 October 2015
hard
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
36 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Masur D.
7-6 6-7 6-3
Ignatik U.
Masur D.
776562
Ignatik U.
657731

Daniel Masur defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 7-6 6-7 6-3 in the Ningbo CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Masur closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Masur D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Masur D.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
7.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Masur D.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
0
Break points saved·Clear edge
73
53
Break points won·Even
5
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
15
2
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
13
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Masur D.Ignatik U.
Freshness·
100
—

Masur D.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Lu Y.[1]
Zopp J.[6]
7-636-1
Semi-finals
Lu Y.[1]
Gojowczyk P.[7]
7-636-3
Zopp J.[6]
Skugor F.
6-47-66
Quarter-finals
Skugor F.
Masur D.
7-666-0
Lu Y.[1]
Fabbiano T.[8]
7-56-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Thompson J.
6-46-4
Zopp J.[6]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
R16
Lu Y.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-27-5
Fabbiano T.[8]
Langer N.
6-47-5
Thompson J.
He Y.
6-16-4
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Moriya H.
7-686-1
Masur D.
Ignatik U.
7-656-756-3
Skugor F.
Cipolla F.
3-66-17-5
Zopp J.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[2]
Mektic N.
6-746-46-2
R32
Moriya H.
Ghedin R.
4-1
Skugor F.
Molchanov D.
6-46-0
Zopp J.[6]
Fallert F.
6-16-1
Mektic N.
Li Y.
6-27-5
Thompson J.
Sela D.[3]
3-66-47-63
Cipolla F.
Soeda G.[4]
6-23-66-1
Lu Y.[1]
Vorster T.
6-36-2
Weintraub A.
Zhang Z.
7-56-0
Langer N.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Fabbiano T.[8]
Qiu Z.
6-06-1
He Y.
Niki T.
6-46-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Sun F.
6-26-1
Masur D.
Nishioka Y.[5]
6-16-2
Ignatik U.
Wu D.
3-66-16-4
Pecotic M.
Bai Y.
6-36-1
Duckworth J.[2]
Zhang Z.
6-36-0