Horacio Zeballos vs Carlos Berlocq — Santiago CH Semi-final
Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 October 2015
clay
Zeballos H.7-5 7-6
Berlocq C.
Zeballos H.
7772
Berlocq C.
5650
Horacio Zeballos defeated Carlos Berlocq 7-5 7-6 in the Santiago CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Horacio Zeballos came in leading the head-to-head 3–1. Horacio Zeballos extended the head-to-head to 4–1.
Key context
- Match story: Horacio Zeballos edged Carlos Berlocq in two tight sets (7–5 7–6).
Head to head
3–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-20 | Rio de Janeiro | R32 | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-2 6-3 |
| 2013-07-22 | Umag | R16 | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
| 2013-07-08 | Bastad | R32 | clay | Carlos Berlocq | 6-4 6-3 |
| 2013-02-04 | Santiago | SF | clay | Horacio Zeballos | 6-3 7-6(4) |
Serve vs return
This seasonEven serve battle
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
45
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
77
Break points won·Dominant
17
42
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
24
Tiebreaks·Even
58
61
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Semi-finals
Bagnis F.[4]
Samper Montana J.
4-66-26-4
Clezar G.
Gonzalez A.[2]
6-16-1
Zeballos H.
Berlocq C.[5]
7-57-65
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Gonzalez M.
6-30-66-3
Quarter-finals
Samper Montana J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Zampieri C.
2-66-36-2
Clezar G.
Gonzalez M.[3]
6-46-2
Gonzalez A.[2]
Londero J.
1-67-636-2
Zeballos H.
Elias G.
7-643-67-64
Gonzalez M.
Ghem A.[7]
6-44-66-4
Berlocq C.[5]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-36-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Souza J.[4]
4-66-37-66
R16
Samper Montana J.
Jarry N.
6-16-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Olivo R.[8]
6-26-3
Bagnis F.[4]
Saez J.
6-36-4
Zampieri C.
Zeballos H.[5]
6-45-76-4
Clezar G.
Arguello F.[6]
6-36-3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
6-35-76-4
Londero J.
Robert S.
6-16-2
Gonzalez A.[2]
Malla B.
6-46-2
Gonzalez M.
Schwartzman D.[1]
6-41-0
Elias G.
Monteiro T.
2-66-36-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Escobar G.
6-46-4
Ghem A.[7]
Bahamonde F.
6-46-2
Berlocq C.[5]
Lama G.
6-14-66-3
Souza J.[4]
Saez J.
6-25-77-65
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Coppejans K.[3]
5-76-36-2
Zeballos H.
Gonzalez A.[2]
7-616-2
R32
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
6-34-66-4
Robert S.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[7]
6-36-2
Bagnis F.[4]
Lama G.
6-35-76-2
Jarry N.
Dutra Silva R.
4-66-36-1
Zampieri C.
Collarini A.
7-56-767-64
Gonzalez A.[2]
De Paula F.
6-46-4
Saez J.
Garin C.
6-46-4
Zeballos H.[5]
Aguilar J.
7-656-4
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Cachin P.
6-36-4
Samper Montana J.
Heras P.
6-33-66-4
Olivo R.[8]
Hocevar R.
6-40-66-4
Arguello F.[6]
Pella G.
6-26-3
Clezar G.
Hernandez J.
6-46-2
Lapentti G.
Molteni A.
6-36-2
Londero J.
Quinzi G.
6-46-4
Malla B.
Rivera Aranguiz G.
7-666-786-2
Dutra Silva R.[8]
Linzer M.
1-2
Schwartzman D.[1]
Samper Montana J.
3-66-17-63
Gonzalez M.
Lagos V.
6-16-2
Bahamonde F.
Martin A.
6-16-3
Ghem A.[7]
Michon A.
3-66-46-1
Souza J.[4]
Garin C.
6-36-4
Escobar G.
Kicker N.
7-666-756-4
Berlocq C.[5]
Pereira J.
6-47-63
Lama G.
Lindell C.
6-36-4
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Malla B.
6-46-2
Coppejans K.[3]
Trungelliti M.
6-47-64
Monteiro T.
Bagnis F.[6]
7-6104-66-2
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.
6-756-46-1
Zeballos H.
Clezar G.
6-756-46-4
Gonzalez A.[2]
Severino C.
6-16-1
Saez J.
Romboli F.
6-17-5