Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Kamil Majchrzak — Casablanca CH Round of 16

Casablanca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP3
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
clay
Kamil Majchrzak
POL
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1723Clay ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-2 6-4
Majchrzak K.
Munoz de la Nava D.
662
Majchrzak K.
240

Daniel Munoz de la Nava defeated Kamil Majchrzak 6-2 6-4 in the Casablanca CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Munoz de la Nava D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Serve advantage — Majchrzak K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Munoz de la Nava D.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
57%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (154 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Munoz de la Nava D.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
68
Break points saved·Dominant
61
97
Break points won·Dominant
20
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
28
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Munoz de la Nava D.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·
—
92

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ouahab L.
Marti J.
6-07-66
Dzumhur D.[4]
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Marti J.
Djere L.
6-16-3
Ouahab L.
Rufin G.
3-66-26-1
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Montanes A.[6]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[4]
Daniel T.[7]
4-66-17-5
Quarter-finals
Rufin G.
Machado R.
7-56-1
Ouahab L.
Ungur A.[3]
6-26-2
Marti J.
Teixeira M.
6-16-0
Djere L.
Serra F.
6-46-2
Montanes A.[6]
Djere L.
6-756-46-1
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-37-62
Dzumhur D.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
6-43-66-2
Daniel T.[7]
De Bakker T.
6-736-46-4
R16
Rufin G.
Montanes A.[1]
6-37-5
Teixeira M.
Klec I.
6-16-2
Machado R.
Cipolla F.
4-66-26-4
Ungur A.[3]
Burquier G.
6-16-3
Ouahab L.
Mektic N.[8]
7-56-4
Marti J.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-06-3
Serra F.
Gigounon G.
6-26-757-5
Djere L.
Skugor F.
6-46-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Dzumhur D.[4]
Safwat M.
6-46-1
Djere L.
Chazal M.
6-36-3
Montanes A.[6]
Kovalik J.
7-55-76-3
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Marti J.
7-56-4
Daniel T.[7]
Riba P.
3-66-26-3
De Bakker T.
Ouahab L.
6-37-5
R32
Mektic N.[8]
Obry J.
6-07-64
Skugor F.
Granollers G.
6-26-3
Cipolla F.
Semrajc J.
6-06-2
Klec I.
Martin F.
6-46-2
Gigounon G.
Cagnina J.[7]
6-44-67-62
Machado R.
Basic M.[6]
6-46-2
Ungur A.[3]
Grigelis L.
7-626-3
Burquier G.
Horansky F.
7-656-3
Montanes A.[1]
Rachidi Y.
6-06-1
Rufin G.
Ahouda A.
6-46-1
Ouahab L.
Novak D.
6-16-3
Marti J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[5]
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Safwat M.
6-22-66-2
Teixeira M.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-34-66-2
Serra F.
Idmbarek Y.
6-16-3
Djere L.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-746-4
Riba P.
Rachidi Y.
6-16-2
Djere L.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-36-2
Chazal M.
Idmbarek Y.
6-26-1
Kovalik J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-692-67-61
Montanes A.[6]
Khaddari H.
6-26-2
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Petrovic D.
3-66-16-3
Majchrzak K.
Ahouda A.
6-06-3
Marti J.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-06-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Zekic M.
6-47-62
Roca Batalla O.
Hamou M.
6-36-2
Safwat M.
Gawron M.
6-44-67-5
Dzumhur D.[4]
Ungur A.
7-56-3
Daniel T.[7]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Ouahab L.
Grigelis L.
7-56-0
De Bakker T.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4