Saketh Myneni vs Tristan Lamasine — Ho Chi Minh City CH Quarter-final

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
IND4
Saketh Myneni
38 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Myneni S.
6-1 2-6 6-3
Lamasine T.
Myneni S.
6262
Lamasine T.
1631

Saketh Myneni defeated Tristan Lamasine 6-1 2-6 6-3 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tristan Lamasine came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Saketh Myneni claimed a first win over Tristan Lamasine in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Saketh Myneni closed it out in three sets, 6–1 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-06-27WimbledonQ1grassTristan Lamasine4-6 7-6(2) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Myneni S.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Myneni S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Myneni S.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (171 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Myneni S.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
21
Break points saved·Dominant
70
38
Break points won·Even
18
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
51
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
54
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Myneni S.[4]
Thompson J.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Myneni S.[4]
Fabbiano T.[5]
5-76-46-2
Thompson J.[8]
Cipolla F.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Duckworth J.[2]
4-67-653-1
Fabbiano T.[5]
Granollers M.[1]
6-36-4
Myneni S.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-12-66-3
Cipolla F.
Nguyen D.
7-647-5
R16
Fabbiano T.[5]
Pecotic M.
6-36-4
Granollers M.[1]
Yang T.
7-51-66-2
Myneni S.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-44-66-1
Lamasine T.
Ehara H.
6-05-76-2
Cipolla F.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Nguyen D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-36-756-1
Thompson J.[8]
Huang L.
6-26-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Singh S.
6-16-2
R32
Granollers M.[1]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Pham M.
6-26-2
Pecotic M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Lee D.
6-46-4
Myneni S.[4]
Granollers G.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-4
Cipolla F.
Wang J.
3-3
Singh S.
Gigounon G.
1-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-2
Ehara H.
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Mertens Y.[7]
6-47-62
Saville L.
Devvarman S.[6]
7-643-66-2
Nguyen D.
Langer N.
6-16-716-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Nagal S.
6-06-726-1
Thompson J.[8]
Bega A.
7-646-2
Huang L.
Hoang T.
6-36-3