Illya Marchenko vs Norbert Gombos — Rennes CH Round of 16

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
UKR8
Illya Marchenko
#1740ATP
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1452Hard ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Marchenko I.
6-1 2-6 7-5
Gombos N.
Marchenko I.
6272
Gombos N.
1651

Illya Marchenko defeated Norbert Gombos 6-1 2-6 7-5 in the Rennes CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Norbert Gombos came in ranked #370, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Illya Marchenko came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marchenko I.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Marchenko I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marchenko I.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marchenko I.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
13
41
Break points saved·Even
80
83
Break points won·Even
7
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Marchenko I.Gombos N.
Freshness·
—
79

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Jaziri M.[4]
Sijsling I.
5-77-56-4
Semi-finals
Sijsling I.
Marchenko I.[8]
7-663-66-4
Jaziri M.[4]
Dodig I.[7]
6-756-37-63
Quarter-finals
Marchenko I.[8]
Khachanov K.
6-46-3
Sijsling I.
Mertl J.
6-786-37-63
Jaziri M.[4]
Ilhan M.[6]
6-21-66-2
Dodig I.[7]
Millot V.
6-44-66-3
R16
Jaziri M.[4]
Ymer E.
4-1
Khachanov K.
Teixeira M.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.[8]
Gombos N.
6-12-67-5
Sijsling I.
Darcis S.[3]
6-46-2
Mertl J.
Krajinovic F.[5]
6-36-4
Ilhan M.[6]
Eysseric J.
6-26-4
Dodig I.[7]
Copil M.
7-57-63
Millot V.
Sidorenko A.
6-46-766-1
R32
Sidorenko A.
Vanni L.
7-647-62
Khachanov K.
Hemery C.
4-67-657-64
Krajinovic F.[5]
Janvier M.
6-47-5
Teixeira M.
Haase R.[1]
6-26-2
Gombos N.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-2
Marchenko I.[8]
Authom M.
6-16-3
Darcis S.[3]
Jahn J.
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Jouan R.
6-27-64
Mertl J.
Barbosa R.
6-46-3
Ilhan M.[6]
Couacaud E.
2-67-56-2
Eysseric J.
Smith J.
6-26-4
Ymer E.
Guez D.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.[4]
Marsalek J.
6-16-2
Dodig I.[7]
Smirnov A.
6-26-3
Copil M.
Boltz S.
7-56-2
Millot V.
Giraldo S.[2]
7-666-2