Angelique Kerber vs Caroline Garcia — Hong Kong Quarter-final

Hong Kong · WTA · Quarter-final
GER2
Angelique Kerber
38 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
FRA7
Caroline Garcia
#772WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Kerber A.
7-5 6-3
Garcia C.
Kerber A.
762
Garcia C.
530

Angelique Kerber defeated Caroline Garcia 7-5 6-3 in the Hong Kong quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Angelique Kerber came in leading the head-to-head 5–4. Angelique Kerber extended the head-to-head to 6–4.

Key context

Head to head

5–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-01United CupRRhardCaroline Garcia1-6 6-2 6-2
2021-03-07DubaiR64hardCaroline Garcia3-6 6-2 6-4
2019-06-17MallorcaQFgrassAngelique Kerber6-3 7-6(5)
2018-05-28Roland GarrosR16clayAngelique Kerber6-2 6-3
2018-03-05Indian WellsR16hardAngelique Kerber6-1 6-1
2017-09-25WuhanR64hardCaroline Garcia3-6 6-3 6-1
2015-01-05BrisbaneR32hardAngelique Kerber6-4 6-3
2014-08-04MontrealR32hardAngelique Kerber6-4 6-1
2014-05-05MadridR64clayCaroline Garcia6-3 2-0 RET

Serve vs return

This season
Kerber A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Garcia C.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kerber A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kerber A.Garcia C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
45%
39%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.4
6.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kerber A.Garcia C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
87
72
Break points saved·Even
91
91
Break points won·Dominant
95
50
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Jankovic J.[4]
Kerber A.[2]
3-67-646-1
Semi-finals
Jankovic J.[4]
Williams V.[3]
6-47-5
Kerber A.[2]
Stosur S.[5]
6-26-2
Quarter-finals
Jankovic J.[4]
Saville D.[6]
6-16-1
Stosur S.[5]
Watson H.
4-66-36-0
Williams V.[3]
Cornet A.[8]
6-16-1
Kerber A.[2]
Garcia C.[7]
7-56-3
R16
Williams V.[3]
Wang Y.
6-06-2
Stosur S.[5]
Puig M.
6-46-4
Garcia C.[7]
Komardina A.
6-06-2
Cornet A.[8]
Shvedova Y.
6-746-36-4
Jankovic J.[4]
Rodionova A.
6-06-2
Saville D.[6]
Arruabarrena L.
7-646-1
Watson H.
Lee Y.
6-06-756-4
Kerber A.[2]
Nara K.
6-26-2
R32
Watson H.
Zhang K.
3-66-16-2
Shvedova Y.
Gajdosova J.
6-46-4
Cornet A.[8]
Baindl K.
6-46-0
Jankovic J.[4]
Bogdan A.
6-46-2
Rodionova A.
Ramialison I.
6-47-5
Arruabarrena L.
Falconi I.
6-46-3
Lee Y.
Jang S.
6-36-1
Puig M.
Kumkhum L.
6-16-2
Stosur S.[5]
Ozaki R.
6-36-1
Komardina A.
Chang K.
6-47-5
Kerber A.[2]
Schiavone F.
6-746-26-3
Wang Y.
Mchale C.
6-34-1
Williams V.[3]
Beygelzimer Y.
2-66-46-4
Saville D.[6]
Kato M.
6-767-56-3
Nara K.
Zhang L.
6-06-3
Garcia C.[7]
Davis L.
6-16-3