Thomas Fabbiano vs Matija Pecotic — Ho Chi Minh City CH Round of 16

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA5
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
CRO
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Fabbiano T.
6-3 6-4
Pecotic M.
Fabbiano T.
662
Pecotic M.
340

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Matija Pecotic 6-3 6-4 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matija Pecotic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Matija Pecotic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-07-19UmagQ1clayMatija Pecotic7-5 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Pecotic M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Pecotic M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 95). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Pecotic M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
28
19
Break points saved·Dominant
81
45
Break points won·Slight edge
16
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
41
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Myneni S.[4]
Thompson J.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Myneni S.[4]
Fabbiano T.[5]
5-76-46-2
Thompson J.[8]
Cipolla F.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Duckworth J.[2]
4-67-653-1
Fabbiano T.[5]
Granollers M.[1]
6-36-4
Myneni S.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-12-66-3
Cipolla F.
Nguyen D.
7-647-5
R16
Fabbiano T.[5]
Pecotic M.
6-36-4
Granollers M.[1]
Yang T.
7-51-66-2
Myneni S.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-44-66-1
Lamasine T.
Ehara H.
6-05-76-2
Cipolla F.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Nguyen D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-36-756-1
Thompson J.[8]
Huang L.
6-26-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Singh S.
6-16-2
R32
Granollers M.[1]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Pham M.
6-26-2
Pecotic M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Lee D.
6-46-4
Myneni S.[4]
Granollers G.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-4
Cipolla F.
Wang J.
3-3
Singh S.
Gigounon G.
1-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-2
Ehara H.
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Mertens Y.[7]
6-47-62
Saville L.
Devvarman S.[6]
7-643-66-2
Nguyen D.
Langer N.
6-16-716-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Nagal S.
6-06-726-1
Thompson J.[8]
Bega A.
7-646-2
Huang L.
Hoang T.
6-36-3