Jordan Thompson vs James Duckworth — Ho Chi Minh City CH Quarter-final

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS8
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
James Duckworth
AUS2
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Thompson J.
4-6 7-6 3-1
Duckworth J.
Thompson J.
4773–
Duckworth J.
6651–

Jordan Thompson advanced when James Duckworth retired 4-6 7-6 3-1 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH quarter-final. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-16NewportR32grassJordan Thompson6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Duckworth J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Thompson J.Duckworth J.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
13

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Duckworth J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
55%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Even
7.2
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Duckworth J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
54
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Clear edge
24
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Thompson J.Duckworth J.
Freshness·
—
91

Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Myneni S.[4]
Thompson J.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Myneni S.[4]
Fabbiano T.[5]
5-76-46-2
Thompson J.[8]
Cipolla F.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Duckworth J.[2]
4-67-653-1
Fabbiano T.[5]
Granollers M.[1]
6-36-4
Myneni S.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-12-66-3
Cipolla F.
Nguyen D.
7-647-5
R16
Fabbiano T.[5]
Pecotic M.
6-36-4
Granollers M.[1]
Yang T.
7-51-66-2
Myneni S.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-44-66-1
Lamasine T.
Ehara H.
6-05-76-2
Cipolla F.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Nguyen D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-36-756-1
Thompson J.[8]
Huang L.
6-26-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Singh S.
6-16-2
R32
Granollers M.[1]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Pham M.
6-26-2
Pecotic M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Lee D.
6-46-4
Myneni S.[4]
Granollers G.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-4
Cipolla F.
Wang J.
3-3
Singh S.
Gigounon G.
1-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-2
Ehara H.
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Mertens Y.[7]
6-47-62
Saville L.
Devvarman S.[6]
7-643-66-2
Nguyen D.
Langer N.
6-16-716-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Nagal S.
6-06-726-1
Thompson J.[8]
Bega A.
7-646-2
Huang L.
Hoang T.
6-36-3