Taro Daniel vs Pere Riba — Casablanca CH Round of 16

Casablanca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Taro Daniel
JPN7
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
clay
ESP
Pere Riba
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Daniel T.
3-6 6-2 6-3
Riba P.
Daniel T.
3662
Riba P.
6231

Taro Daniel defeated Pere Riba 3-6 6-2 6-3 in the Casablanca CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-02-03Vina del MarQ2clayTaro Daniel7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Riba P.

Riba P.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Serve advantage — Riba P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Riba P.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.1
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Riba P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
37
Break points saved·Dominant
93
53
Break points won·Slight edge
37
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
18
61
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Riba P.
Freshness·
59
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 83 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ouahab L.
Marti J.
6-07-66
Dzumhur D.[4]
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
3-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Marti J.
Djere L.
6-16-3
Ouahab L.
Rufin G.
3-66-26-1
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Montanes A.[6]
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[4]
Daniel T.[7]
4-66-17-5
Quarter-finals
Rufin G.
Machado R.
7-56-1
Ouahab L.
Ungur A.[3]
6-26-2
Marti J.
Teixeira M.
6-16-0
Djere L.
Serra F.
6-46-2
Montanes A.[6]
Djere L.
6-756-46-1
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-37-62
Dzumhur D.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
6-43-66-2
Daniel T.[7]
De Bakker T.
6-736-46-4
R16
Rufin G.
Montanes A.[1]
6-37-5
Teixeira M.
Klec I.
6-16-2
Machado R.
Cipolla F.
4-66-26-4
Ungur A.[3]
Burquier G.
6-16-3
Ouahab L.
Mektic N.[8]
7-56-4
Marti J.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-06-3
Serra F.
Gigounon G.
6-26-757-5
Djere L.
Skugor F.
6-46-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Majchrzak K.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Roca Batalla O.
6-26-4
Dzumhur D.[4]
Safwat M.
6-46-1
Djere L.
Chazal M.
6-36-3
Montanes A.[6]
Kovalik J.
7-55-76-3
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Marti J.
7-56-4
Daniel T.[7]
Riba P.
3-66-26-3
De Bakker T.
Ouahab L.
6-37-5
R32
Mektic N.[8]
Obry J.
6-07-64
Skugor F.
Granollers G.
6-26-3
Cipolla F.
Semrajc J.
6-06-2
Klec I.
Martin F.
6-46-2
Gigounon G.
Cagnina J.[7]
6-44-67-62
Machado R.
Basic M.[6]
6-46-2
Ungur A.[3]
Grigelis L.
7-626-3
Burquier G.
Horansky F.
7-656-3
Montanes A.[1]
Rachidi Y.
6-06-1
Rufin G.
Ahouda A.
6-46-1
Ouahab L.
Novak D.
6-16-3
Marti J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[5]
7-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Safwat M.
6-22-66-2
Teixeira M.
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-34-66-2
Serra F.
Idmbarek Y.
6-16-3
Djere L.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-746-4
Riba P.
Rachidi Y.
6-16-2
Djere L.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-36-2
Chazal M.
Idmbarek Y.
6-26-1
Kovalik J.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-692-67-61
Montanes A.[6]
Khaddari H.
6-26-2
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Petrovic D.
3-66-16-3
Majchrzak K.
Ahouda A.
6-06-3
Marti J.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-06-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Zekic M.
6-47-62
Roca Batalla O.
Hamou M.
6-36-2
Safwat M.
Gawron M.
6-44-67-5
Dzumhur D.[4]
Ungur A.
7-56-3
Daniel T.[7]
Cachin P.
7-656-3
Ouahab L.
Grigelis L.
7-56-0
De Bakker T.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4