Jordan Thompson vs Flavio Cipolla — Ho Chi Minh City CH Semi-final

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Jordan Thompson
AUS8
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
ITA
Flavio Cipolla
42 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLW
Thompson J.
6-1 7-5
Cipolla F.
Thompson J.
672
Cipolla F.
150

Jordan Thompson defeated Flavio Cipolla 6-1 7-5 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cipolla F.

Cipolla F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Cipolla F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
60%
73%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
74%
59%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.2
0.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Cipolla F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
18
Break points saved·Dominant
97
33
Break points won·Clear edge
24
36
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
38
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Myneni S.[4]
Thompson J.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Myneni S.[4]
Fabbiano T.[5]
5-76-46-2
Thompson J.[8]
Cipolla F.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Duckworth J.[2]
4-67-653-1
Fabbiano T.[5]
Granollers M.[1]
6-36-4
Myneni S.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-12-66-3
Cipolla F.
Nguyen D.
7-647-5
R16
Fabbiano T.[5]
Pecotic M.
6-36-4
Granollers M.[1]
Yang T.
7-51-66-2
Myneni S.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-44-66-1
Lamasine T.
Ehara H.
6-05-76-2
Cipolla F.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Nguyen D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-36-756-1
Thompson J.[8]
Huang L.
6-26-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Singh S.
6-16-2
R32
Granollers M.[1]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Pham M.
6-26-2
Pecotic M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Lee D.
6-46-4
Myneni S.[4]
Granollers G.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-4
Cipolla F.
Wang J.
3-3
Singh S.
Gigounon G.
1-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-2
Ehara H.
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Mertens Y.[7]
6-47-62
Saville L.
Devvarman S.[6]
7-643-66-2
Nguyen D.
Langer N.
6-16-716-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Nagal S.
6-06-726-1
Thompson J.[8]
Bega A.
7-646-2
Huang L.
Hoang T.
6-36-3