Flavio Cipolla vs Daniel Nguyen — Ho Chi Minh City CH Quarter-final

Ho Chi Minh City CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ITA
Flavio Cipolla
42 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 October 2015
hard
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
Cipolla F.
7-6 7-5
Nguyen D.
Cipolla F.
7772
Nguyen D.
6450

Flavio Cipolla defeated Daniel Nguyen 7-6 7-5 in the Ho Chi Minh City CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cipolla F.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Nguyen D.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cipolla F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cipolla F.Nguyen D.
1st serve in·Clear edge
73%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.8
3.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (61 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cipolla F.Nguyen D.
Clutch Rating·Even
18
21
Break points saved·Even
33
37
Break points won·Clear edge
36
22
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
59
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
35
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Myneni S.[4]
Thompson J.[8]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Myneni S.[4]
Fabbiano T.[5]
5-76-46-2
Thompson J.[8]
Cipolla F.
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Thompson J.[8]
Duckworth J.[2]
4-67-653-1
Fabbiano T.[5]
Granollers M.[1]
6-36-4
Myneni S.[4]
Lamasine T.
6-12-66-3
Cipolla F.
Nguyen D.
7-647-5
R16
Fabbiano T.[5]
Pecotic M.
6-36-4
Granollers M.[1]
Yang T.
7-51-66-2
Myneni S.[4]
Uchiyama Y.
6-44-66-1
Lamasine T.
Ehara H.
6-05-76-2
Cipolla F.
Saville L.
7-56-3
Nguyen D.
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
6-36-756-1
Thompson J.[8]
Huang L.
6-26-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Singh S.
6-16-2
R32
Granollers M.[1]
Masur D.
6-36-3
Yang T.
Pham M.
6-26-2
Pecotic M.
Sundar Prashanth N.
6-47-5
Fabbiano T.[5]
Lee D.
6-46-4
Myneni S.[4]
Granollers G.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-26-4
Cipolla F.
Wang J.
3-3
Singh S.
Gigounon G.
1-66-36-4
Duckworth J.[2]
Ly N.
6-26-2
Ehara H.
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-26-2
Lamasine T.
Mertens Y.[7]
6-47-62
Saville L.
Devvarman S.[6]
7-643-66-2
Nguyen D.
Langer N.
6-16-716-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[3]
Nagal S.
6-06-726-1
Thompson J.[8]
Bega A.
7-646-2
Huang L.
Hoang T.
6-36-3