Jordi Samper Montana vs Juan Sebastian Gomez — Medellin CH Round of 32

Medellin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP6
Jordi Samper Montana
36 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2015
clay
COL
Juan Sebastian Gomez
#565ATP
1231ELO
1221Clay ELO
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Samper Montana J.
6-3 6-4
Gomez J.
Samper Montana J.
662
Gomez J.
340

Jordi Samper Montana defeated Juan Sebastian Gomez 6-3 6-4 in the Medellin CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Samper Montana J.serving54% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Gomez J.

Gomez J.serving52% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Samper Montana J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Samper Montana J.Gomez J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
43%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
41%
42%
Break points saved·Even
54%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 91). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Samper Montana J.Gomez J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
18
39
Break points saved·Slight edge
20
10
Break points won·Clear edge
41
58
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
89
Tiebreaks·
26
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Samper Montana J.Gomez J.
Freshness·
—
94

Gomez J.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Lorenzi P.[1]
Lama G.
7-632-0
Semi-finals
Lama G.
Samper Montana J.[6]
7-667-65
Lorenzi P.[1]
Lapentti G.[7]
7-626-1
Quarter-finals
Lorenzi P.[1]
Clezar G.[5]
7-636-4
Lapentti G.[7]
Struvay E.
6-17-62
Samper Montana J.[6]
Londero J.
7-666-776-3
Lama G.
Gonzalez A.[2]
6-46-4
R16
Lorenzi P.[1]
Galarza J.
3-66-46-4
Clezar G.[5]
Mantilla F.
7-666-3
Struvay E.
Kobelt P.
6-36-2
Lapentti G.[7]
Mena F.
6-32-66-3
Samper Montana J.[6]
Baughman D.
5-76-46-4
Londero J.
Gomez E.
6-796-36-4
Lama G.
Varillas J.
7-56-2
Gonzalez A.[2]
Marcora R.
6-36-3
R32
Struvay E.
Falla A.[3]
2-1
Mena F.
Endara I.
6-46-1
Lapentti G.[7]
Quinzi G.
6-26-2
Samper Montana J.[6]
Gomez J.
6-36-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Romboli F.
6-36-2
Londero J.
Souza J.[4]
6-26-3
Galarza J.
Escobar G.
7-643-66-2
Mantilla F.
Galan D.
3-66-46-2
Clezar G.[5]
Reuter Y.
6-25-76-1
Kobelt P.
Diaz Figueroa C.
7-625-76-4
Baughman D.
El Mihdawy A.
6-36-3
Gomez E.
Escobar F.
6-37-65
Lama G.
Barrientos N.[8]
6-43-66-3
Varillas J.
Neis F.
7-676-4
Marcora R.
Arevalo M.
6-27-5
Gonzalez A.[2]
Molteni A.
6-16-3