Timea Bacsinszky vs Sara Errani — Beijing Quarter-final
Beijing · WTA · Quarter-final
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 October 2015
hard
Bacsinszky T.0-6 6-3 7-5
Errani S.
Bacsinszky T.
0672
Errani S.
6351
Timea Bacsinszky defeated Sara Errani 0-6 6-3 7-5 in the Beijing quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Timea Bacsinszky came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. Timea Bacsinszky extended the head-to-head to 3–1.
Key context
- Match story: Timea Bacsinszky recovered from a 0–6 opening set to beat Sara Errani.
Head to head
2–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-03-02 | Monterrey | SF | hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-0 4-6 7-6(3) |
| 2012-05-14 | Rome | R64 | clay | Sara Errani | 6-0 3-0 RET |
| 2009-07-06 | Budapest | R32 | clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 5-7 6-4 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
78%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
52%
Return points won·Even
45%
48%
Break points saved·Even
53%
49%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
0.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (170 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Even
35
36
Break points saved·Dominant
46
8
Break points won·Clear edge
76
98
Deciding sets·Clear edge
66
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
17
34
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
23°CClear
Wind 7 km/hHumidity 57%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Muguruza G.[5]
Mattek Sands B.
6-17-5
Radwanska A.[4]
Kerber A.[10]
6-16-4
Ivanovic A.[6]
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-37-5
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Errani S.
0-66-37-5
R16
Mattek Sands B.
Vinci R.[15]
6-13-66-2
Muguruza G.[5]
Lucic M.
1-66-26-1
Kerber A.[10]
Wozniacki C.[8]
6-26-3
Ivanovic A.[6]
Kuznetsova S.
7-54-66-2
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Pennetta F.[3]
3-66-46-3
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
6-44-67-5
Errani S.
Petkovic A.[13]
3-66-36-2
Radwanska A.[4]
Keys M.[14]
6-3
R32
Mattek Sands B.
Arruabarrena L.
0-66-26-0
Vinci R.[15]
Van Uytvanck A.
6-26-2
Muguruza G.[5]
Falconi I.
6-26-1
Radwanska A.[4]
Barthel M.
4-66-16-4
Keys M.[14]
Bondarenko K.
3-66-16-0
Kerber A.[10]
Cibulkova D.
6-16-4
Ivanovic A.[6]
Williams V.
7-636-2
Kuznetsova S.
Stephens S.
3-66-36-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Svitolina E.[16]
6-41-66-3
Pennetta F.[3]
Pereira T.
3-66-06-4
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
Puig M.
7-616-2
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Duque Marino M.
7-56-2
Petkovic A.[13]
Stosur S.
6-27-5
Errani S.
Garcia C.
6-43-66-1
Lucic M.
Bencic B.[11]
W/O
Wozniacki C.[8]
Wang Q.
7-56-0
R64
Stephens S.
Pliskova K.[9]
6-36-2
Arruabarrena L.
Halep S.[1]
5-4
Puig M.
Diyas Z.
6-4
Falconi I.
Saville D.
7-52-66-4
Barthel M.
Zhang S.
6-36-2
Bondarenko K.
Strycova B.
6-36-2
Keys M.[14]
Mladenovic K.
7-56-2
Cibulkova D.
Jankovic J.
6-11-66-3
Wang Q.
Lepchenko V.
6-23-66-2
Wozniacki C.[8]
Jovanovski B.
6-26-4
Kuznetsova S.
Witthoeft C.
6-46-4
Pavlyuchenkova A.
Goerges J.
6-26-4
Pereira T.
Dulgheru A.
7-56-2
Bacsinszky T.[12]
Giorgi C.
1-66-46-3
Stosur S.
Niculescu M.
6-36-2
Garcia C.
Zheng S.
6-26-2
Errani S.
Kvitova P.[2]
7-56-4
Radwanska A.[4]
Vandeweghe C.
6-3
Suarez Navarro C.[7]
Tsurenko L.
6-3
Petkovic A.[13]
Bouchard E.
6-21-1
Pennetta F.[3]
Han X.
7-54-66-4
Van Uytvanck A.
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Lucic M.
Begu I.
6-13-66-3
Ivanovic A.[6]
Dellacqua C.
6-46-0
Svitolina E.[16]
Putintseva Y.
7-56-2
Duque Marino M.
Pironkova T.
6-36-3
Mattek Sands B.
Cornet A.
6-36-3
Bencic B.[11]
Brengle M.
6-746-46-3