Inigo Cervantes Huegun vs Matteo Berrettini — Rome CH Round of 32
Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 September 2015
clay
#43ATP
1831ELO
1790Clay ELO
$902kYTD
$15MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
Cervantes Huegun I.6-3 6-4
Berrettini M.
Cervantes Huegun I.
662
Berrettini M.
340
Inigo Cervantes Huegun defeated Matteo Berrettini 6-3 6-4 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.
Key context
- Match story: Inigo Cervantes Huegun closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Berrettini M.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on clay
Cervantes Huegun I.Berrettini M.
—
Serve
51
—
Return
35
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Clear edge
51%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
78%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
69%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.3
10.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
13
81
Break points saved·Dominant
71
100
Break points won·Dominant
19
53
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
9
98
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
83
Berrettini M.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Draw
Semi-finals
Bedene A.[1]
Starace P.
6-46-3
Pavlasek A.
Cecchinato M.[5]
7-53-66-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Lajovic D.[3]
7-687-65
Krajinovic F.[5]
Cecchinato M.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Bedene A.[1]
Daniel T.[6]
6-26-4
Starace P.
Edmund K.[4]
6-46-4
Cecchinato M.[5]
Ungur A.
6-36-4
Pavlasek A.
Brown D.[2]
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Montanes A.[8]
7-56-1
Lajovic D.[3]
Riba P.
4-66-36-2
Krajinovic F.[5]
De Bakker T.
6-16-3
R16
Edmund K.[4]
Berrettini M.
6-36-3
Bedene A.[1]
Authom M.
6-16-2
Daniel T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
7-622-66-4
Starace P.
Martin A.
6-04-67-62
Cecchinato M.[5]
Rublev A.
6-16-4
Ungur A.
Cachin P.
6-36-4
Pavlasek A.
Ymer E.[8]
6-26-4
Brown D.[2]
Delic M.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
Volandri F.
6-04-66-1
Delbonis F.[1]
Di Meo G.
6-26-0
Montanes A.[8]
Marti J.
4-67-626-3
Lajovic D.[3]
Viola M.
6-26-0
Riba P.
Ignatik U.
2-66-16-3
Cecchinato M.[4]
Naso G.
2-66-46-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Fucsovics M.
2-67-56-1
De Bakker T.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-35-76-3
R32
Daniel T.[6]
Melzer G.
7-622-63-0
Martin A.
Molchanov D.
6-46-0
Cachin P.
Khachanov K.
1-66-26-2
Brown D.[2]
Cipolla F.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.
Sonego L.
3-66-16-0
Bedene A.[1]
Baldi F.
7-676-1
Authom M.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-33-66-2
Edmund K.[4]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-36-3
Berrettini M.
Mertl J.
6-46-2
Starace P.
Kravchuk K.[7]
7-623-66-1
Cecchinato M.[5]
Marcora R.
7-56-2
Rublev A.
Trungelliti M.
7-646-3
Ungur A.
Stepanek R.[3]
6-36-747-63
Ymer E.[8]
Mecir Jr M.
3-66-16-1
Pavlasek A.
Travaglia S.
7-56-4
Delic M.
Arnaboldi A.
7-646-3
Marti J.
Mager G.
7-55-76-2
Viola M.
Carballes Baena R.
3-67-666-1
Riba P.
Cipolla F.
6-36-2
Ignatik U.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Volandri F.
Zekic M.
6-26-0
De Bakker T.
Bonadio R.
6-06-2
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Martin A.
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Di Meo G.
Tsitsipas S.
6-46-4
Montanes A.[8]
Giannessi A.
2-66-36-2
Lajovic D.[3]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-17-62
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
Berrettini M.
6-36-4
Naso G.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Krajinovic F.[5]
Cachin P.
6-36-1
Fucsovics M.
Hemery C.
6-26-0