Angelique Kerber vs Daria Saville — Tokyo Round of 32
Tokyo · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 September 2015
hard
Kerber A.6-2 6-2
Saville D.
Kerber A.
662
Saville D.
220
Angelique Kerber defeated Daria Saville 6-2 6-2 in the Tokyo round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Angelique Kerber came in leading the head-to-head 4–1, defending last year's semi-final. Angelique Kerber extended the head-to-head to 5–1.
Key context
- Match story: Angelique Kerber dropped just 4 games past Daria Saville.
Head to head
4–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-10 | Hong Kong | QF | hard | Daria Saville | 6-3 6-1 |
| 2016-06-13 | Birmingham | R16 | grass | Angelique Kerber | 5-7 6-2 6-2 |
| 2015-08-03 | Stanford | R32 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-1 6-3 |
| 2015-01-12 | Sydney | R16 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-7(6) 7-6(2) 6-3 |
| 2015-01-05 | Brisbane | R16 | hard | Angelique Kerber | 6-3 7-5 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
42%
Service points won·Even
57%
55%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Even
1.4
1.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
5.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
87
64
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
79
Break points won·Slight edge
95
87
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
90
51
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CMainly clear
Wind 6 km/hHumidity 62%
Draw
Semi-finals
Linette M.
Mchale C.[6]
3-66-46-3
Wickmayer Y.
Tomljanovic A.[7]
7-56-2
Bencic B.[8]
Wozniacki C.[1]
6-26-4
Radwanska A.[7]
Cibulkova D.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Wickmayer Y.
Bondarenko K.
3-66-36-4
Tomljanovic A.[7]
Brengle M.[3]
1-66-36-4
Linette M.
Hsieh S.
6-36-3
Mchale C.[6]
Zheng S.
2-66-36-3
Wozniacki C.[1]
Kerber A.[5]
6-22-66-3
Bencic B.[8]
Muguruza G.[3]
7-616-1
Radwanska A.[7]
Pliskova K.[4]
7-56-2
Cibulkova D.
Ivanovic A.[2]
7-656-3
R16
Bondarenko K.
Gajdosova J.
6-13-66-4
Mchale C.[6]
Ozaki R.
6-17-5
Linette M.
Diyas Z.[2]
6-27-5
Hsieh S.
Nara K.
6-26-4
Wickmayer Y.
Larsson J.[5]
7-56-3
Brengle M.[3]
Hibino N.
6-16-2
Tomljanovic A.[7]
Date Krumm K.
7-656-3
Zheng S.
Falconi I.
6-46-2
Wozniacki C.[1]
Konjuh A.
6-26-2
Bencic B.[8]
Stosur S.
6-756-36-4
Radwanska A.[7]
Svitolina E.
6-46-1
Pliskova K.[4]
Nara K.
6-26-4
Cibulkova D.
Suarez Navarro C.[6]
6-46-4
Ivanovic A.[2]
Giorgi C.
7-56-2
Kerber A.[5]
Brengle M.
5-76-16-0
Muguruza G.[3]
Strycova B.
6-36-4
R32
Linette M.
Davis L.
6-36-2
Nara K.
Mitu C.
6-16-4
Zheng S.
Riske Amritraj A.[4]
0-66-46-1
Bondarenko K.
Suarez Navarro C.[1]
6-46-4
Gajdosova J.
Panova A.
6-36-4
Wickmayer Y.
Siniakova K.
6-46-3
Larsson J.[5]
Wang Q.
0-66-36-3
Brengle M.[3]
Friedsam A.
6-36-1
Hibino N.
Kuwata H.
3-66-46-4
Date Krumm K.
Doi M.
6-46-2
Tomljanovic A.[7]
Babos T.
3-66-47-62
Mchale C.[6]
Putintseva Y.
6-37-5
Ozaki R.
Jovanovski B.
6-16-1
Falconi I.
Osaka N.
5-77-56-3
Hsieh S.
Hercog P.[8]
6-15-77-5
Diyas Z.[2]
Bertens K.
6-46-4
Cibulkova D.
Lucic M.
6-41-0
Radwanska A.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
6-36-3
Kerber A.[5]
Saville D.
6-26-2
Konjuh A.
Mladenovic K.
6-03-66-3
Brengle M.
Diyas Z.
6-26-2
Strycova B.
Osaka N.
7-56-2
Stosur S.
Riske Amritraj A.
4-66-16-3
Bencic B.[8]
Xu Y.
6-06-0
Nara K.
Doi M.
7-616-2
Suarez Navarro C.[6]
Bondarenko K.
7-636-2
Giorgi C.
Garcia C.
4-67-636-3
Svitolina E.
Savchuk O.
6-26-0