Marius Copil vs Mirza Basic — Izmir CH Semi-final

Izmir CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 September 2015
hard
Mirza Basic
BIH7
Mirza Basic
#602ATP
35 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Copil M.
6-3 6-4
Basic M.
Copil M.
662
Basic M.
340

Marius Copil defeated Mirza Basic 6-3 6-4 in the Izmir CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mirza Basic came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, defending last year's quarter-final. Marius Copil narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Marius Copil closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-30WashingtonR64hardMarius Copil7-6(9) 6-4
2018-02-05SofiaFhardMirza Basic7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-4
2016-01-18Australian OpenQ2hardMirza Basic6-3 7-6(1)

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Basic M.

Basic M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Basic M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Basic M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
33
Break points saved·Dominant
91
56
Break points won·Even
3
4
Deciding sets·Even
63
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Lacko L.[4]
Copil M.
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Copil M.
Basic M.[7]
6-36-4
Lacko L.[4]
Jaziri M.[2]
6-736-36-3
Quarter-finals
Basic M.[7]
Ilhan M.[1]
6-46-736-3
Copil M.
Dustov F.[8]
6-26-0
Lacko L.[4]
Ramanathan R.
6-37-5
Jaziri M.[2]
Metreveli A.
6-47-64
R16
Basic M.[7]
Pecotic M.
3-66-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Masur D.
4-67-647-63
Copil M.
Ivashka I.
7-645-76-4
Ilhan M.[1]
Bjelica I.
3-66-46-4
Dustov F.[8]
Setkic A.
6-47-61
Lacko L.[4]
Grigelis L.
6-16-4
Metreveli A.
Konecny M.
3-66-36-3
Jaziri M.[2]
Vasilevski A.
6-47-63
R32
Ilhan M.[1]
Mertens Y.
6-26-3
Dustov F.[8]
Popko D.
4-67-57-64
Bjelica I.
Erguden B.
7-56-3
Konecny M.
Molchanov D.
6-36-3
Pecotic M.
Myneni S.
7-56-4
Basic M.[7]
Chrysochos P.
7-647-5
Copil M.
Karatsev A.
4-66-36-4
Ivashka I.
Agabigun S.
7-56-0
Setkic A.
Chiudinelli M.
6-16-1
Ramanathan R.
Ymer E.[6]
6-736-37-5
Masur D.
Neuchrist M.
7-656-0
Grigelis L.
Celikbilek A.
6-47-64
Lacko L.[4]
Yalcinkale B.
6-06-1
Metreveli A.
Crepaldi E.
6-46-727-60
Vasilevski A.
Barrere G.
6-46-4
Jaziri M.[2]
Vorster T.
6-23-66-1