Amir Weintraub vs Go Soeda — Nanchang CH Round of 32

Nanchang CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 September 2015
clay
JPN2
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Weintraub A.
6-2 6-1
Soeda G.
Weintraub A.
662
Soeda G.
210

Amir Weintraub defeated Go Soeda 6-2 6-1 in the Nanchang CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Amir Weintraub came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Amir Weintraub extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-09-14Davis Cup WG PO: JPN vs ISRRRhardAmir Weintraub6-3 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Weintraub A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Serve advantage — Soeda G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Weintraub A.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (70 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Weintraub A.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
45
61
Break points won·Clear edge
29
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
35
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Weintraub A.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Fabbiano T.[7]
3-67-647-62
Weintraub A.
Thompson J.[8]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Weintraub A.
Bai Y.
W/O
Fabbiano T.[7]
Sarkissian A.
6-16-4
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Meister N.
6-26-2
Thompson J.[8]
Zopp J.[4]
6-13-66-0
R16
Sarkissian A.
Tearney F.
6-16-2
Meister N.
Vanni L.[3]
4-66-46-3
Weintraub A.
Ghedin R.
6-47-63
Fabbiano T.[7]
He Y.
4-66-36-2
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-46-0
Thompson J.[8]
Barrientos N.
7-656-2
Zopp J.[4]
Yang T.
5-76-46-2
Bai Y.
Sugita Y.[6]
6-46-3
R32
Fabbiano T.[7]
Moriya H.
6-30-66-4
Zopp J.[4]
Lee D.
7-626-1
Meister N.
Zhu Z.
4-1
Tearney F.
Chen T.
6-16-4
Sarkissian A.
Tatlot J.
6-47-65
He Y.
Qiu Z.
6-36-2
Vanni L.[3]
Huang L.
6-46-3
Nedunchezhiyan J.
Van Peperzeel G.
6-14-66-3
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Propoggia D.
6-47-5
Thompson J.[8]
Medvedev D.
6-16-4
Barrientos N.
Balaji N.
6-32-66-1
Yang T.
Niki T.
6-44-66-3
Sugita Y.[6]
Eysseric J.
6-36-3
Bai Y.
Ning Y.
6-36-3
Ghedin R.
Trungelliti M.
6-10-66-1
Weintraub A.
Soeda G.[2]
6-26-1