Jordan Thompson vs Jurgen Zopp — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 September 2015
hard
EST5
Jurgen Zopp
38 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLL
Thompson J.
6-1 7-5
Zopp J.
Thompson J.
672
Zopp J.
150

Jordan Thompson defeated Jurgen Zopp 6-1 7-5 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Jordan Thompson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Zopp J.

Zopp J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Zopp J.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Zopp J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
39
Break points saved·Dominant
97
69
Break points won·Clear edge
24
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
91
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Bhambri Y.[4]
Wu D.
3-66-07-63
Semi-finals
Bhambri Y.[4]
Medvedev D.
6-33-0
Wu D.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.
Fabbiano T.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Barrientos N.
6-36-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Thompson J.
6-26-2
Wu D.
Sugita Y.[8]
6-22-67-64
R16
Thompson J.
Myneni S.
3-66-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Bai Y.
6-33-66-0
Medvedev D.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-737-636-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Zhang Z.
7-56-3
Sugita Y.[8]
Meister N.
6-47-65
Wu D.
Weintraub A.
7-56-0
Barrientos N.
Yang T.
7-616-766-3
Trungelliti M.
Soeda G.[2]
6-36-2
R32
Zhang Z.
Huang L.
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[8]
Hua R.
6-37-5
Medvedev D.
Lee D.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Li Z.
6-17-5
Fabbiano T.
Ito T.[1]
6-736-46-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Chen T.
3-66-16-2
Bhambri Y.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-26-2
Myneni S.
Balaji N.
6-46-3
Thompson J.
Zopp J.[5]
6-17-5
Meister N.
He Y.
6-12-66-4
Wu D.
Moriya H.
4-67-686-1
Weintraub A.
Vanni L.[3]
7-633-66-3
Barrientos N.
Devvarman S.[6]
6-42-66-4
Yang T.
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Wang J.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[2]
Whittington A.
6-26-1