Thomas Fabbiano vs Tatsuma Ito — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Thomas Fabbiano
37 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 September 2015
hard
JPN1
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Fabbiano T.
6-7 6-4 6-3
Ito T.
Fabbiano T.
63662
Ito T.
77431

Thomas Fabbiano defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-7 6-4 6-3 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Thomas Fabbiano claimed a first win over Tatsuma Ito in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-23ZhuhaiQ1hardTatsuma Ito6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Fabbiano T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fabbiano T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fabbiano T.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fabbiano T.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Even
28
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
61
Break points won·Slight edge
16
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
43
Tiebreaks·Even
44
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Bhambri Y.[4]
Wu D.
3-66-07-63
Semi-finals
Bhambri Y.[4]
Medvedev D.
6-33-0
Wu D.
Trungelliti M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Medvedev D.
Fabbiano T.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Barrientos N.
6-36-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Thompson J.
6-26-2
Wu D.
Sugita Y.[8]
6-22-67-64
R16
Thompson J.
Myneni S.
3-66-36-2
Fabbiano T.
Bai Y.
6-33-66-0
Medvedev D.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-737-636-4
Bhambri Y.[4]
Zhang Z.
7-56-3
Sugita Y.[8]
Meister N.
6-47-65
Wu D.
Weintraub A.
7-56-0
Barrientos N.
Yang T.
7-616-766-3
Trungelliti M.
Soeda G.[2]
6-36-2
R32
Zhang Z.
Huang L.
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[8]
Hua R.
6-37-5
Medvedev D.
Lee D.
6-46-0
Bai Y.
Li Z.
6-17-5
Fabbiano T.
Ito T.[1]
6-736-46-3
Gojowczyk P.[7]
Chen T.
3-66-16-2
Bhambri Y.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-26-2
Myneni S.
Balaji N.
6-46-3
Thompson J.
Zopp J.[5]
6-17-5
Meister N.
He Y.
6-12-66-4
Wu D.
Moriya H.
4-67-686-1
Weintraub A.
Vanni L.[3]
7-633-66-3
Barrientos N.
Devvarman S.[6]
6-42-66-4
Yang T.
Sarkissian A.
2-66-46-4
Trungelliti M.
Wang J.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[2]
Whittington A.
6-26-1