Pedro Cachin vs Daniel Gimeno Traver — Seville CH Round of 32

Seville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Pedro Cachin
#1328ATP
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 September 2015
clay
ESP2
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Cachin P.
6-3 6-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Cachin P.
662
Gimeno Traver D.
340

Pedro Cachin defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 6-3 6-4 in the Seville CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Gimeno Traver came in defending last year's round of 32, but Pedro Cachin had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 10 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Pedro Cachin closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cachin P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Cachin P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cachin P.Gimeno Traver D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cachin P.Gimeno Traver D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
22
15
Break points saved·Dominant
77
50
Break points won·Slight edge
21
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
11
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cachin P.
Carreno Busta P.[1]
7-56-3
Semi-finals
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Cervantes Huegun I.[3]
6-44-0
Cachin P.
Samper Montana J.[8]
4-66-06-2
Quarter-finals
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Riba P.
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Zekic M.
6-43-66-3
Samper Montana J.[8]
Majchrzak K.
2-67-56-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[3]
Olivo R.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Riba P.
Cipolla F.
6-16-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[3]
Teixeira M.
7-646-4
Olivo R.[6]
Ouahab L.
6-46-4
Samper Montana J.[8]
Perez Sanz D.
6-17-65
Majchrzak K.
Vega Hernandez D.
6-46-1
Zekic M.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-36-3
Cachin P.
Middelkoop M.
4-66-16-3
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Michon A.
7-636-3
R32
Carreno Busta P.[1]
Bortolotti M.
6-36-2
Michon A.
Munar J.
6-46-3
Cervantes Huegun I.[3]
Kovalik J.
7-646-3
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Lizariturry J.
6-37-5
Riba P.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-36-1
Cipolla F.
Mertl J.[7]
6-41-66-1
Teixeira M.
Romboli F.
7-56-3
Ouahab L.
Gakhov I.
0-66-26-1
Olivo R.[6]
Vilella Martinez M.
2-66-06-1
Samper Montana J.[8]
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-36-3
Perez Sanz D.
Rumenov Payakov G.
0-66-47-66
Vega Hernandez D.
Boje Ordonez A.
6-46-1
Majchrzak K.
Montanes A.[4]
6-16-4
Zekic M.
Menendez Maceiras A.[5]
4-66-36-4
Middelkoop M.
Krstin P.
6-33-66-2
Cachin P.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-36-4