Daniel Brands vs Lorenzo Giustino — Como CH Round of 16

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Daniel Brands
38 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 31 August 2015
clay
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1355Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Brands D.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Giustino L.
Brands D.
6362
Giustino L.
4631

Daniel Brands defeated Lorenzo Giustino 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Como CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lorenzo Giustino came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Brands closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brands D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Giustino L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Brands D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brands D.Giustino L.
1st serve in·Even
66%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.2
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Brands D.Giustino L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
2
Break points saved·Dominant
90
41
Break points won·Slight edge
7
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
72
12
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
49
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Brands D.Giustino L.
Freshness·
—
51

Giustino L.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kuznetsov A.[2]
Brands D.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Kuznetsov A.[2]
Cachin P.
6-27-5
Brands D.
Berlocq C.[3]
6-41-66-3
Quarter-finals
Brands D.
Carballes Baena R.[8]
7-57-65
Berlocq C.[3]
Arnaboldi A.[5]
6-06-1
Cachin P.
Martin A.[7]
2-67-626-3
Kuznetsov A.[2]
Gomez Herrera C.
7-636-2
R16
Brands D.
Giustino L.
6-43-66-3
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Saez J.
6-36-0
Berlocq C.[3]
Romboli F.
6-16-2
Arnaboldi A.[5]
Bonadio R.
6-36-4
Martin A.[7]
Kovalik J.
3-66-26-4
Cachin P.
Naso G.
6-36-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Sonego L.
6-36-0
Kuznetsov A.[2]
Elias G.
7-666-3
R32
Naso G.
De Schepper K.[4]
7-666-757-63
Kuznetsov A.[2]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-26-3
Berlocq C.[3]
Gaio F.
6-37-65
Arnaboldi A.[5]
Mager G.
3-66-46-3
Brands D.
Teixeira M.
7-686-3
Giustino L.
Crepaldi E.
7-56-4
Saez J.
Musialek A.
6-16-3
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Delic M.
3-66-37-5
Romboli F.
Sijsling I.
6-31-66-3
Bonadio R.
Caruso S.
7-57-61
Martin A.[7]
Volandri F.
7-56-3
Kovalik J.
Licciardi P.
6-17-65
Cachin P.
Basso A.
6-36-4
Gomez Herrera C.
Dustov F.[6]
6-16-1
Sonego L.
Eremin E.
6-16-2
Elias G.
Skugor F.
6-36-3