Frances Tiafoe vs James Duckworth — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
Frances Tiafoe
USA
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 23 August 2015
hard
James Duckworth
AUS
James Duckworth
#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Tiafoe F.
3-6 7-6 7-6
Duckworth J.
Tiafoe F.
377772
Duckworth J.
664631

Frances Tiafoe defeated James Duckworth 3-6 7-6 7-6 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Frances Tiafoe came in ranked #17. Frances Tiafoe extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-01HoustonR16clayFrances Tiafoe6-2 6-7(4) 7-5
2015-05-17NiceR32clayJames Duckworth6-7(5) 7-5 6-2
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Tiafoe F.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Duckworth J.

Duckworth J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tiafoe F.Duckworth J.
38
Serve
25
37
Return
23

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tiafoe F.Duckworth J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
55%
Service points won·Even
66%
67%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
8.0
7.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tiafoe F.Duckworth J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
83
55
Break points saved·Even
99
97
Break points won·Dominant
57
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
98
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Tiafoe F.Duckworth J.
Freshness·Slight edge
82
91

Tiafoe F.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Anderson K.[2]
Herbert P.
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Herbert P.
Johnson S.[13]
3-67-656-2
Anderson K.[2]
Jaziri M.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Johnson S.[13]
Lu Y.
W/O
Herbert P.
Carreno Busta P.
4-67-656-2
Jaziri M.
Bellucci T.[6]
6-36-2
Anderson K.[2]
Coric B.[8]
6-27-61
R16
Lu Y.
Chung H.
7-611-67-5
Herbert P.
Bedene A.
6-36-0
Carreno Busta P.
Bolelli S.
6-44-66-1
Johnson S.[13]
Tsonga J.[3]
6-34-67-64
Jaziri M.
Gabashvili T.[15]
7-56-4
Anderson K.[2]
Janowicz J.[16]
7-626-4
Coric B.[8]
Schwartzman D.
6-26-1
Bellucci T.[6]
Vesely J.[11]
6-16-776-4
R32
Herbert P.
Baghdatis M.[14]
6-32-67-5
Tsonga J.[3]
Istomin D.
5-76-46-1
Johnson S.[13]
Groth S.
6-46-746-1
Lu Y.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-36-3
Vesely J.[11]
Klizan M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.
Troicki V.[4]
6-44-66-4
Coric B.[8]
Giraldo S.
4-66-26-2
Schwartzman D.
Andujar P.[12]
4-67-57-5
Janowicz J.[16]
Rosol L.
6-36-2
Bedene A.
Simon G.[1]
6-757-657-66
Bolelli S.
Querrey S.[7]
7-676-747-69
Gabashvili T.[15]
Kokkinakis T.
7-656-757-63
Anderson K.[2]
Kukushkin M.
4-66-26-3
Bellucci T.[6]
Tiafoe F.
6-32-67-62
Chung H.
Paire B.[9]
6-16-4
Carreno Busta P.
Sousa J.[10]
6-46-4
R64
Carreno Busta P.
Haas T.
6-36-4
Bolelli S.
Delbonis F.
6-46-3
Istomin D.
Young D.
6-36-3
Chung H.
Ward J.
6-776-46-3
Lu Y.
Haase R.
7-646-2
Klizan M.
Ilhan M.
7-616-2
Jaziri M.
Souza J.
6-36-4
Schwartzman D.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-47-68
Kukushkin M.
Mahut N.
6-46-746-0
Bedene A.
Cecchinato M.
6-26-2
Groth S.
Donaldson J.
6-747-687-65
Kokkinakis T.
Dolgopolov A.
7-617-65
Giraldo S.
Darcis S.
2-0
Herbert P.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-2
Tiafoe F.
Duckworth J.
3-67-647-63
Rosol L.
Gulbis E.
6-47-64