Pere Riba vs Jordi Samper Montana — Meerbusch CH Round of 16

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP
Pere Riba
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 August 2015
clay
ESP7
Jordi Samper Montana
36 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Riba P.
6-2 6-3
Samper Montana J.
Riba P.
662
Samper Montana J.
230

Pere Riba defeated Jordi Samper Montana 6-2 6-3 in the Meerbusch CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jordi Samper Montana came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Pere Riba claimed a first win over Jordi Samper Montana in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-08-29US OpenQ1hardJordi Samper Montana2-6 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Riba P.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Samper Montana J.

Samper Montana J.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Riba P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Riba P.Samper Montana J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
57%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
2.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (82 vs 120). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Riba P.Samper Montana J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
37
18
Break points saved·Dominant
53
20
Break points won·Even
45
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
61
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
33
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Berlocq C.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Arguello F.[3]
6-46-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Riba P.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Reuter Y.
6-37-64
Arguello F.[3]
Hanescu V.[8]
6-36-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Brands D.
6-36-2
Riba P.
Michalicka M.
7-56-3
R16
Berlocq C.[4]
Garin C.
6-46-3
Brands D.
Golubev A.[6]
4-66-36-1
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Trungelliti M.
7-56-1
Reuter Y.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
6-17-64
Arguello F.[3]
Saez J.
6-36-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Doumbia S.
6-736-46-0
Riba P.
Samper Montana J.[7]
6-26-3
Michalicka M.
Brown D.[2]
2-66-36-1
R32
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Davydenko P.
7-55-76-1
Trungelliti M.
Musialek A.
7-57-61
Reuter Y.
Panfil G.
6-16-0
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
De Greef A.
7-656-0
Arguello F.[3]
Greven M.
6-27-5
Saez J.
Novak D.
6-16-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Setkic A.
7-626-3
Golubev A.[6]
Daljev P.
6-16-2
Brands D.
Ivanov V.
3-66-36-2
Garin C.
Cagnina J.
6-23-66-3
Doumbia S.
Geerts M.
6-46-3
Berlocq C.[4]
Puetz T.
4-66-46-2
Samper Montana J.[7]
Petzschner P.
6-37-62
Riba P.
Dubarenco M.
6-46-3
Michalicka M.
Trinker B.
6-22-67-62
Brown D.[2]
Bellotti R.
6-46-2