Yannik Reuter vs Hans Podlipnik Castillo — Meerbusch CH Round of 16

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
BEL
Yannik Reuter
35 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 August 2015
clay
CHI5
Hans Podlipnik Castillo
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWL
Reuter Y.
6-1 7-6
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Reuter Y.
6772
Podlipnik Castillo H.
1640

Yannik Reuter defeated Hans Podlipnik Castillo 6-1 7-6 in the Meerbusch CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Hans Podlipnik Castillo came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Yannik Reuter came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reuter Y.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Podlipnik Castillo H.

Podlipnik Castillo H.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Reuter Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reuter Y.Podlipnik Castillo H.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (97 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reuter Y.Podlipnik Castillo H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
6
Break points saved·Clear edge
28
47
Break points won·Clear edge
29
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
50
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
44
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Berlocq C.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Arguello F.[3]
6-46-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Riba P.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Reuter Y.
6-37-64
Arguello F.[3]
Hanescu V.[8]
6-36-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Brands D.
6-36-2
Riba P.
Michalicka M.
7-56-3
R16
Berlocq C.[4]
Garin C.
6-46-3
Brands D.
Golubev A.[6]
4-66-36-1
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Trungelliti M.
7-56-1
Reuter Y.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
6-17-64
Arguello F.[3]
Saez J.
6-36-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Doumbia S.
6-736-46-0
Riba P.
Samper Montana J.[7]
6-26-3
Michalicka M.
Brown D.[2]
2-66-36-1
R32
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Davydenko P.
7-55-76-1
Trungelliti M.
Musialek A.
7-57-61
Reuter Y.
Panfil G.
6-16-0
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
De Greef A.
7-656-0
Arguello F.[3]
Greven M.
6-27-5
Saez J.
Novak D.
6-16-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Setkic A.
7-626-3
Golubev A.[6]
Daljev P.
6-16-2
Brands D.
Ivanov V.
3-66-36-2
Garin C.
Cagnina J.
6-23-66-3
Doumbia S.
Geerts M.
6-46-3
Berlocq C.[4]
Puetz T.
4-66-46-2
Samper Montana J.[7]
Petzschner P.
6-37-62
Riba P.
Dubarenco M.
6-46-3
Michalicka M.
Trinker B.
6-22-67-62
Brown D.[2]
Bellotti R.
6-46-2