Andreas Haider Maurer vs Facundo Arguello — Meerbusch CH Semi-final

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUT1
Andreas Haider Maurer
39 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 August 2015
clay
ARG3
Facundo Arguello
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWWW
Haider Maurer A.
6-4 6-4
Arguello F.
Haider Maurer A.
662
Arguello F.
440

Andreas Haider Maurer defeated Facundo Arguello 6-4 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Andreas Haider Maurer came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Haider Maurer A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Arguello F.

Arguello F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Haider Maurer A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Haider Maurer A.Arguello F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (116 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Haider Maurer A.Arguello F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
6
Break points saved·Dominant
73
34
Break points won·Even
23
24
Deciding sets·Clear edge
30
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Berlocq C.[4]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Arguello F.[3]
6-46-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Riba P.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Reuter Y.
6-37-64
Arguello F.[3]
Hanescu V.[8]
6-36-4
Berlocq C.[4]
Brands D.
6-36-2
Riba P.
Michalicka M.
7-56-3
R16
Berlocq C.[4]
Garin C.
6-46-3
Brands D.
Golubev A.[6]
4-66-36-1
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Trungelliti M.
7-56-1
Reuter Y.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
6-17-64
Arguello F.[3]
Saez J.
6-36-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Doumbia S.
6-736-46-0
Riba P.
Samper Montana J.[7]
6-26-3
Michalicka M.
Brown D.[2]
2-66-36-1
R32
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Davydenko P.
7-55-76-1
Trungelliti M.
Musialek A.
7-57-61
Reuter Y.
Panfil G.
6-16-0
Podlipnik Castillo H.[5]
De Greef A.
7-656-0
Arguello F.[3]
Greven M.
6-27-5
Saez J.
Novak D.
6-16-2
Hanescu V.[8]
Setkic A.
7-626-3
Golubev A.[6]
Daljev P.
6-16-2
Brands D.
Ivanov V.
3-66-36-2
Garin C.
Cagnina J.
6-23-66-3
Doumbia S.
Geerts M.
6-46-3
Berlocq C.[4]
Puetz T.
4-66-46-2
Samper Montana J.[7]
Petzschner P.
6-37-62
Riba P.
Dubarenco M.
6-46-3
Michalicka M.
Trinker B.
6-22-67-62
Brown D.[2]
Bellotti R.
6-46-2