Daniel Nguyen vs Jurgen Zopp — Aptos CH Round of 32

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Daniel Nguyen
35 yrs
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2015
hard
EST
Jurgen Zopp
38 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLL
Nguyen D.
6-4 6-4
Zopp J.
Nguyen D.
662
Zopp J.
440

Daniel Nguyen defeated Jurgen Zopp 6-4 6-4 in the Aptos CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Daniel Nguyen came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Nguyen edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nguyen D.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zopp J.

Zopp J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nguyen D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nguyen D.Zopp J.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.6
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nguyen D.Zopp J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
21
39
Break points saved·Dominant
37
69
Break points won·Clear edge
22
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Millman J.[1]
Krajicek A.[7]
7-52-66-3
Semi-finals
Millman J.[1]
Edmund K.[3]
3-66-47-5
Krajicek A.[7]
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[1]
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-3
Edmund K.[3]
Nishioka Y.[8]
3-66-36-3
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ebden M.[6]
6-46-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Jaziri M.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Millman J.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-2
Daniel T.[5]
Dustov F.
6-757-56-0
Edmund K.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-56-3
Nishioka Y.[8]
Donaldson J.
4-66-36-3
Ebden M.[6]
Haas T.
2-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Zverev M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.[2]
Clezar G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Millman J.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Dustov F.
Sandgren T.
1-66-26-1
Nishioka Y.[8]
Krueger M.
6-31-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Zhang Z.
7-666-2
Edmund K.[3]
Niki T.
6-16-2
Nguyen D.
Zopp J.
6-46-4
Donaldson J.
Elias G.
7-626-3
Ebden M.[6]
Broady L.
7-646-3
Haas T.
Rublev A.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Bhambri Y.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Copil M.
3-67-56-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Novikov D.
6-746-47-67
Zverev M.
Fritz T.
6-717-56-3
Clezar G.
Devvarman S.
6-21-66-3
Jaziri M.[2]
Khachanov K.
6-36-1