Tommy Haas vs Andrey Rublev — Aptos CH Round of 32

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tommy Haas
48 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2015
hard
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1849Hard ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Haas T.
6-4 6-3
Rublev A.
Haas T.
662
Rublev A.
430

Tommy Haas defeated Andrey Rublev 6-4 6-3 in the Aptos CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tommy Haas closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Haas T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving94% hold

wins 74% of points on serve vs Haas T.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Haas T.Rublev A.
—
Serve
55
—
Return
52

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Haas T.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
7.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (32 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Haas T.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
89
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
100
Break points won·Dominant
35
72
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
87
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Haas T.Rublev A.
Freshness·
—
95

Rublev A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Millman J.[1]
Krajicek A.[7]
7-52-66-3
Semi-finals
Millman J.[1]
Edmund K.[3]
3-66-47-5
Krajicek A.[7]
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[1]
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-3
Edmund K.[3]
Nishioka Y.[8]
3-66-36-3
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ebden M.[6]
6-46-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Jaziri M.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Millman J.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-2
Daniel T.[5]
Dustov F.
6-757-56-0
Edmund K.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-56-3
Nishioka Y.[8]
Donaldson J.
4-66-36-3
Ebden M.[6]
Haas T.
2-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Zverev M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.[2]
Clezar G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Millman J.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Dustov F.
Sandgren T.
1-66-26-1
Nishioka Y.[8]
Krueger M.
6-31-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Zhang Z.
7-666-2
Edmund K.[3]
Niki T.
6-16-2
Nguyen D.
Zopp J.
6-46-4
Donaldson J.
Elias G.
7-626-3
Ebden M.[6]
Broady L.
7-646-3
Haas T.
Rublev A.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Bhambri Y.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Copil M.
3-67-56-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Novikov D.
6-746-47-67
Zverev M.
Fritz T.
6-717-56-3
Clezar G.
Devvarman S.
6-21-66-3
Jaziri M.[2]
Khachanov K.
6-36-1