Kyle Edmund vs Yoshihito Nishioka — Aptos CH Quarter-final

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR3
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2015
hard
Yoshihito Nishioka
JPN8
Yoshihito Nishioka
#177ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
Edmund K.
3-6 6-3 6-3
Nishioka Y.
Edmund K.
3662
Nishioka Y.
6331

Kyle Edmund defeated Yoshihito Nishioka 3-6 6-3 6-3 in the Aptos CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Yoshihito Nishioka came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Kyle Edmund claimed a first win over Yoshihito Nishioka in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-10-19Cologne 2R32hardYoshihito Nishioka6-4 6-0
2015-08-31US OpenQ3hardYoshihito Nishioka6-2 0-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Nishioka Y.

Nishioka Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve advantage — Edmund K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Nishioka Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
54%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Nishioka Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
32
84
Break points saved·Even
92
95
Break points won·Dominant
21
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Millman J.[1]
Krajicek A.[7]
7-52-66-3
Semi-finals
Millman J.[1]
Edmund K.[3]
3-66-47-5
Krajicek A.[7]
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[1]
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-3
Edmund K.[3]
Nishioka Y.[8]
3-66-36-3
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ebden M.[6]
6-46-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Jaziri M.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Millman J.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-2
Daniel T.[5]
Dustov F.
6-757-56-0
Edmund K.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-56-3
Nishioka Y.[8]
Donaldson J.
4-66-36-3
Ebden M.[6]
Haas T.
2-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Zverev M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.[2]
Clezar G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Millman J.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Dustov F.
Sandgren T.
1-66-26-1
Nishioka Y.[8]
Krueger M.
6-31-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Zhang Z.
7-666-2
Edmund K.[3]
Niki T.
6-16-2
Nguyen D.
Zopp J.
6-46-4
Donaldson J.
Elias G.
7-626-3
Ebden M.[6]
Broady L.
7-646-3
Haas T.
Rublev A.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Bhambri Y.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Copil M.
3-67-56-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Novikov D.
6-746-47-67
Zverev M.
Fritz T.
6-717-56-3
Clezar G.
Devvarman S.
6-21-66-3
Jaziri M.[2]
Khachanov K.
6-36-1