John Millman vs Taro Daniel — Aptos CH Quarter-final

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS1
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 August 2015
hard
Taro Daniel
JPN5
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1512Hard ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
Millman J.
6-1 6-3
Daniel T.
Millman J.
662
Daniel T.
130

John Millman defeated Taro Daniel 6-1 6-3 in the Aptos CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's round of 32. John Millman narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-11Monte Carlo MastersQ1clayTaro Daniel6-2 6-3
2021-04-19BelgradeR16hardTaro Daniel3-6 6-2 6-3
2019-09-30TokyoQFhardJohn Millman6-4 6-0
2018-08-20Winston-SalemR64hardTaro Daniel6-4 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Millman J.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Daniel T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Millman J.Daniel T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Millman J.Daniel T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
42
Break points saved·Even
95
93
Break points won·Dominant
64
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
16
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
74
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Millman J.Daniel T.
Freshness·
—
69

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Millman J.[1]
Krajicek A.[7]
7-52-66-3
Semi-finals
Millman J.[1]
Edmund K.[3]
3-66-47-5
Krajicek A.[7]
Fratangelo B.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[1]
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-3
Edmund K.[3]
Nishioka Y.[8]
3-66-36-3
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ebden M.[6]
6-46-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Jaziri M.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Millman J.[1]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-2
Daniel T.[5]
Dustov F.
6-757-56-0
Edmund K.[3]
Nguyen D.
7-56-3
Nishioka Y.[8]
Donaldson J.
4-66-36-3
Ebden M.[6]
Haas T.
2-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[4]
Ymer E.
6-36-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Zverev M.
6-36-4
Jaziri M.[2]
Clezar G.
6-33-66-3
R32
Millman J.[1]
Sarkissian A.
6-26-0
Dustov F.
Sandgren T.
1-66-26-1
Nishioka Y.[8]
Krueger M.
6-31-66-3
Andreozzi G.
Klein B.
6-46-4
Daniel T.[5]
Zhang Z.
7-666-2
Edmund K.[3]
Niki T.
6-16-2
Nguyen D.
Zopp J.
6-46-4
Donaldson J.
Elias G.
7-626-3
Ebden M.[6]
Broady L.
7-646-3
Haas T.
Rublev A.
6-46-3
Ymer E.
Bhambri Y.
6-26-2
Fratangelo B.[4]
Copil M.
3-67-56-2
Krajicek A.[7]
Novikov D.
6-746-47-67
Zverev M.
Fritz T.
6-717-56-3
Clezar G.
Devvarman S.
6-21-66-3
Jaziri M.[2]
Khachanov K.
6-36-1