Tobias Kamke vs Flavio Cipolla — Liberec CH Round of 16

Liberec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Tobias Kamke
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 August 2015
clay
ITA
Flavio Cipolla
42 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWLW
Kamke T.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Cipolla F.
Kamke T.
6362
Cipolla F.
2631

Tobias Kamke defeated Flavio Cipolla 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Liberec CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tobias Kamke came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Tobias Kamke extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tobias Kamke closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardTobias Kamke6-1 6-4 6-1
2012-07-09StuttgartR32grassTobias Kamke6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kamke T.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cipolla F.

Cipolla F.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kamke T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kamke T.Cipolla F.
1st serve in·Clear edge
58%
73%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
56%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.8
0.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kamke T.Cipolla F.
Clutch Rating·Even
14
18
Break points saved·Dominant
69
33
Break points won·Clear edge
22
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
38
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kamke T.
Martin A.
7-666-4
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Albot R.[3]
6-22-66-3
Kamke T.
Zeballos H.[6]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Martin A.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[8]
6-16-0
Albot R.[3]
Pavlasek A.[7]
6-16-1
Zeballos H.[6]
Olivo R.
6-746-46-4
Kamke T.
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
7-56-4
R16
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Bourgue M.
7-56-3
Albot R.[3]
Londero J.
6-16-4
Martin A.
Delic M.
6-12-66-3
Podlipnik Castillo H.[8]
Satral J.
6-43-67-5
Pavlasek A.[7]
Mertl J.
7-666-2
Zeballos H.[6]
Veic A.
6-16-2
Olivo R.
Coppejans K.[4]
3-66-27-65
Kamke T.
Cipolla F.
6-23-66-3
R32
Mertl J.
Jebavy R.
7-51-1
Albot R.[3]
Checa Calvo J.
6-23-1
Cervantes Huegun I.[5]
Ignatik U.
4-66-27-5
Delic M.
Darcis S.[1]
6-16-4
Martin A.
Fucsovics M.
6-36-3
Satral J.
Molteni A.
6-46-2
Podlipnik Castillo H.[8]
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Londero J.
Puetz T.
4-66-46-3
Pavlasek A.[7]
Gigounon G.
7-54-66-3
Veic A.
Ramirez C.
6-46-3
Zeballos H.[6]
Laaksonen H.
6-36-0
Olivo R.
Stanek R.
2-66-26-2
Coppejans K.[4]
Saez J.
6-06-1
Bourgue M.
Krstin P.
6-26-3
Cipolla F.
Carballes Baena R.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Nedovyesov A.[2]
6-46-3