Sam Groth vs Frances Tiafoe — Atlanta Round of 32

Atlanta · ATP · Round of 32
AUS
Sam Groth
38 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 July 2015
hard
Frances Tiafoe
USA
Frances Tiafoe
#17ATP
1918ELO
1861Hard ELO
$1.9MYTD
$18MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Groth S.
7-6 6-4
Tiafoe F.
Groth S.
7762
Tiafoe F.
6340

Sam Groth defeated Frances Tiafoe 7-6 6-4 in the Atlanta round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Groth S.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Tiafoe F.

Tiafoe F.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Groth S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Groth S.Tiafoe F.
—
Serve
38
—
Return
37

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Groth S.Tiafoe F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
79%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
68%
66%
Return points won·Even
32%
36%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.1
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.1
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Groth S.Tiafoe F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
83
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
99
Break points won·Dominant
7
57
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
31
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Groth S.Tiafoe F.
Freshness·
—
79

Tiafoe F.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Isner J.[1]
Baghdatis M.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Baghdatis M.[5]
Muller G.[7]
6-746-37-64
Isner J.[1]
Kudla D.
4-66-27-5
Quarter-finals
Isner J.[1]
Berankis R.
7-656-4
Muller G.[7]
Soeda G.
7-56-1
Baghdatis M.[5]
Pospisil V.[2]
6-47-65
Kudla D.
Sela D.
7-56-0
R16
Isner J.[1]
Stepanek R.
7-637-67
Berankis R.
Johnson S.[6]
6-46-2
Kudla D.
Sock J.[3]
7-666-3
Sela D.
Becker B.[8]
7-56-3
Muller G.[7]
Donaldson J.
6-36-2
Soeda G.
Mannarino A.[4]
6-26-4
Baghdatis M.[5]
Groth S.
7-53-66-3
Pospisil V.[2]
Lu Y.
6-46-736-4
R32
Stepanek R.
Eubanks C.
6-26-2
Berankis R.
Smyczek T.
6-46-4
Johnson S.[6]
Lacko L.
6-16-736-2
Kudla D.
Harrison R.
3-66-47-65
Muller G.[7]
Young D.
6-26-1
Donaldson J.
Devvarman S.
6-13-66-4
Soeda G.
Dolgopolov A.
5-77-656-3
Groth S.
Tiafoe F.
7-636-4
Lu Y.
Jaziri M.
6-17-612
Becker B.[8]
Berrer M.
7-5
Sela D.
Fish M.
6-46-4
Baghdatis M.[5]
Krajicek A.
6-46-0