Joao Sousa vs Fabio FogniniUmag Quarter-final

Umag · ATP · Quarter-final
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 20 July 2015
clay
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Sousa J.
6-2 3-6 7-6
Fognini F.
Sousa J.
63782
Fognini F.
26661

Joao Sousa defeated Fabio Fognini 6-2 3-6 7-6 in the Umag quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Fabio Fognini came in leading the head-to-head 5–0, defending last year's semi-final, but Joao Sousa had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on clay. Joao Sousa claimed a first win over Fabio Fognini in six meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Joao Sousa closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

05
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-08Madrid MastersR64clayFabio Fognini6-4 6-4
2017-03-20Miami MastersR64hardFabio Fognini7-6(8) 2-6 6-3
2016-01-11AucklandR32hardFabio Fognini6-4 2-6 7-6(3)
2015-10-11Shanghai MastersR64hardFabio Fognini7-6(2) 6-3
2014-04-13Monte Carlo MastersR64clayFabio Fognini5-7 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Sousa J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Fognini F.

Fognini F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Sousa J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
35
87
Break points saved·Even
91
93
Break points won·Dominant
14
81
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
93
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast