Duck Hee Lee vs Nicolas Kicker — Padova CH Round of 32

Padova CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR
Duck Hee Lee
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 June 2015
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Lee D.
6-1 6-2
Kicker N.
Lee D.
662
Kicker N.
120

Duck Hee Lee defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-1 6-2 in the Padova CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Duck Hee Lee came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Duck Hee Lee extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-01-16Australian OpenQ1hardDuck Hee Lee5-7 7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Lee D.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lee D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lee D.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lee D.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
6
30
Break points saved·Dominant
13
56
Break points won·Clear edge
30
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
18
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
60
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lee D.Kicker N.
Freshness·
—
100

Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Martin A.
Montanes A.[4]
0-66-47-66
Semi-finals
Martin A.
Hemery C.
6-756-46-2
Montanes A.[4]
Gaio F.
3-66-37-5
Quarter-finals
Martin A.
Giannessi A.
6-27-66
Hemery C.
Cecchinato M.[3]
6-46-3
Montanes A.[4]
Podlipnik Castillo H.[7]
7-56-4
Gaio F.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-06-3
R16
Hemery C.
Cachin P.
6-16-4
Martin A.
Gonzalez A.[1]
6-36-1
Giannessi A.
Bellotti R.
3-66-16-4
Cecchinato M.[3]
Lee D.
6-26-2
Podlipnik Castillo H.[7]
Giacalone O.
6-46-2
Montanes A.[4]
Crepaldi E.
6-06-0
Gaio F.
Volandri F.
6-26-1
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Dellien H.
5-77-56-3
R32
Giacalone O.
Viola M.
4-67-53-0
Bellotti R.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-44-2
Gonzalez A.[1]
Sousa P.
7-56-1
Martin A.
Safwat M.
6-26-3
Cecchinato M.[3]
Napolitano S.
6-46-2
Montanes A.[4]
Lindell C.
7-56-3
Dellien H.
Fabbiano T.
3-66-16-3
Hemery C.
Bourgue M.[8]
6-25-77-65
Volandri F.
Arguello F.[5]
6-06-3
Giannessi A.
Rublev A.
3-66-26-4
Lee D.
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Cachin P.
Arnaboldi A.
6-17-65
Podlipnik Castillo H.[7]
Travaglia S.
2-66-37-66
Crepaldi E.
Gigounon G.
5-76-26-2
Gaio F.
Samper Montana J.
6-47-64
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
Gonzalez M.[2]
4-67-696-4