Tatsuma Ito vs Ricardas Berankis — s Hertogenbosch Round of 32

s Hertogenbosch · ATP · Round of 32
JPN
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 June 2015
grass
LTU
Ricardas Berankis
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Ito T.
6-3 7-6
Berankis R.
Ito T.
6772
Berankis R.
3640

Tatsuma Ito defeated Ricardas Berankis 6-3 7-6 in the s Hertogenbosch round of 32 on grass. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-06-23WimbledonQ3grassTatsuma Ito5-7 4-6 6-3 7-5 6-0
2013-12-29BrisbaneQ2hardTatsuma Ito7-6(5) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Berankis R.

Berankis R.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Berankis R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Berankis R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
24
58
Break points saved·Dominant
61
91
Break points won·Slight edge
9
16
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Mahut N.
Goffin D.[2]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Mahut N.
Haase R.
5-76-36-4
Goffin D.[2]
Muller G.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Haase R.
Karlovic I.[5]
6-746-47-63
Muller G.
Copil M.
7-646-1
Goffin D.[2]
Marchenko I.
4-67-636-2
Mahut N.
Mannarino A.
6-16-3
R16
Haase R.
Verdasco F.[7]
7-646-3
Mahut N.
Bautista Agut R.[3]
6-26-4
Muller G.
Pospisil V.[9]
6-44-67-66
Copil M.
Garcia Lopez G.[4]
7-656-4
Marchenko I.
Sousa J.[8]
6-37-62
Goffin D.[2]
Melzer J.
7-626-2
Karlovic I.[5]
Ito T.
7-657-63
Mannarino A.
Chiudinelli M.
6-36-2
R32
Ito T.
Berankis R.
6-37-64
Haase R.
Kavcic B.
6-27-5
Verdasco F.[7]
Gimeno Traver D.
7-636-766-2
Chiudinelli M.
Paire B.
7-632-67-64
Pospisil V.[9]
Matosevic M.
6-36-2
Muller G.
Ilhan M.
6-07-5
Copil M.
Nieminen J.
6-32-66-4
Sousa J.[8]
Istomin D.
6-20-66-2
Marchenko I.
Youzhny M.
6-46-4
Melzer J.
De Schepper K.
6-46-756-3
Mannarino A.
Lu Y.
6-46-3
Mahut N.
Hewitt L.
6-36-4