Radu Albot vs Andrey Rublev — Moscow CH Semi-final

Moscow CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Radu Albot
MDA5
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1440Clay ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 June 2015
clay
Andrey Rublev
RUS
Andrey Rublev
#16ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Albot R.
6-4 6-7 6-3
Rublev A.
Albot R.
66662
Rublev A.
47831

Radu Albot defeated Andrey Rublev 6-4 6-7 6-3 in the Moscow CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #16. Radu Albot extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Radu Albot closed it out in three sets, 6–4 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-11-02Paris MastersR32hardAndrey Rublev6-1 6-2
2016-02-08MemphisQ1hardRadu Albot6-3 6-4
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Rublev A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Albot R.Rublev A.
—
Serve
13
—
Return
64

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Rublev A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.0
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Rublev A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
88
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
100
Break points won·Dominant
19
72
Deciding sets·Clear edge
76
97
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
92

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Rublev A.
Freshness·Slight edge
93
100

Albot R.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Rublev A.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
Albot R.[5]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Albot R.[5]
Rublev A.
6-46-766-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
Zeballos H.[8]
6-796-46-1
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.
Donskoy E.
6-46-756-4
Zeballos H.[8]
Dzumhur D.[3]
7-646-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
Granollers M.[1]
6-35-76-4
Albot R.[5]
Gabashvili T.[2]
6-36-4
R16
Donskoy E.
Khachanov K.
6-37-61
Granollers M.[1]
De Paula F.
6-36-1
Zeballos H.[8]
Elgin M.
6-36-4
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
Medvedev D.
6-07-68
Dzumhur D.[3]
Dubarenco M.
6-46-3
Rublev A.
Olivo R.
6-33-66-4
Albot R.[5]
Brkic T.
4-66-36-2
Gabashvili T.[2]
Veic A.
6-46-3
R32
Veic A.
Eysseric J.
6-26-2
Gabashvili T.[2]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-56-4
Dubarenco M.
Zekic M.
7-666-2
De Paula F.
Viola M.
7-53-67-5
Munoz de la Nava D.[7]
Monteiro T.
6-34-67-64
Dzumhur D.[3]
Davydenko P.
3-66-26-2
Zeballos H.[8]
Machado R.
6-36-1
Olivo R.
Kudryavtsev A.[6]
3-67-56-2
Rublev A.
Djere L.
6-17-62
Elgin M.
Zaitsev A.
6-26-3
Granollers M.[1]
Marie J.
6-24-66-4
Medvedev D.
Tiurnev E.
6-44-66-3
Khachanov K.
Shyla Y.
6-44-66-3
Donskoy E.
Rola B.[4]
3-66-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Heras P.
7-656-756-2
Brkic T.
Gakhov I.
6-26-4