Christopher Oconnell vs Takuto Niki — Gimcheon CH Round of 16

Gimcheon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 2 June 2015
hard
JPN6
Takuto Niki
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLWLWL
Oconnell C.
2-6 6-3 6-1
Niki T.
Oconnell C.
2662
Niki T.
6311

Christopher Oconnell defeated Takuto Niki 2-6 6-3 6-1 in the Gimcheon CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Niki T.

Niki T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Niki T.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Niki T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Niki T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
14
Break points saved·Dominant
98
41
Break points won·Slight edge
22
32
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
25
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sarkissian A.[8]
Smith C.[5]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Sarkissian A.[8]
Kim C.
6-15-76-4
Smith C.[5]
Ehara H.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Ehara H.
Nam J.
7-56-3
Kim C.
Oconnell C.
7-56-4
Sarkissian A.[8]
Kim Y.
6-46-4
Smith C.[5]
Statham J.
6-46-2
R16
Statham J.
Bester P.
6-22-0
Sarkissian A.[8]
Li Z.
6-46-2
Kim C.
Soeda G.[1]
6-747-56-2
Oconnell C.
Niki T.[6]
2-66-36-1
Kim Y.
Wolmarans F.
6-36-756-3
Ehara H.
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-1
Nam J.
Ramanathan R.[4]
3-66-26-3
Smith C.[5]
Singh K.
6-34-66-4
R32
Kim C.
Matsui T.
6-21-0
Li Z.
Lee J.
6-36-2
Sekiguchi S.
Tepavac M.
6-16-3
Singh K.
Kwon S.
6-44-66-4
Soeda G.[1]
Nedunchezhiyan J.
6-46-2
Niki T.[6]
Lee D.
6-26-3
Oconnell C.
Jang W.
7-656-3
Wolmarans F.
Nguyen D.[3]
7-636-1
Kim Y.
Jasika O.
6-36-4
Sarkissian A.[8]
Mott B.
7-616-3
Ehara H.
Perez Sanz D.[7]
0-66-26-2
Nam J.
Roelofse R.
6-26-4
Ramanathan R.[4]
Takeuchi K.
6-26-2
Smith C.[5]
Kibi Y.
6-16-1
Statham J.
Na J.
6-46-4
Bester P.
Chen T.[2]
6-46-2