Facundo Bagnis vs Guilherme Clezar — Vicenza CH Round of 16

Vicenza CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ARG1
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 25 May 2015
clay
BRA
Guilherme Clezar
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Bagnis F.
6-3 6-4
Clezar G.
Bagnis F.
662
Clezar G.
340

Facundo Bagnis defeated Guilherme Clezar 6-3 6-4 in the Vicenza CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Guilherme Clezar came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 9 on clay. Facundo Bagnis claimed a first win over Guilherme Clezar in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-04-06HoustonQ2clayGuilherme Clezar6-2 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Clezar G.

Clezar G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Clezar G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Clezar G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
13
Break points saved·Dominant
92
65
Break points won·Dominant
35
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
19
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cervantes Huegun I.
Millman J.[6]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Millman J.[6]
De Bakker T.[7]
2-66-37-65
Cervantes Huegun I.
Fratangelo B.[8]
6-756-36-2
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[6]
Cachin P.
6-36-746-1
De Bakker T.[7]
Bagnis F.[1]
6-43-66-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Pella G.[4]
6-46-3
Cervantes Huegun I.
Andreozzi G.
6-23-66-3
R16
De Bakker T.[7]
Olivo R.
6-46-0
Bagnis F.[1]
Clezar G.
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Volandri F.
6-37-64
Millman J.[6]
Pavlasek A.
6-36-2
Fratangelo B.[8]
Donati M.
6-46-3
Pella G.[4]
Gaio F.
6-23-66-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Montanes A.[5]
6-46-1
Andreozzi G.
Riba P.
6-16-3
R32
Donati M.
Pereira J.
7-56-2
Clezar G.
Dancevic F.
7-676-716-3
Olivo R.
Buchanan C.
6-46-3
Volandri F.
Ward J.[3]
6-06-2
De Bakker T.[7]
Napolitano S.
7-56-2
Bagnis F.[1]
Caruso S.
6-26-3
Cachin P.
Boutillier R.
6-37-5
Pavlasek A.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Millman J.[6]
Rublev A.
4-66-36-3
Fratangelo B.[8]
Marcora R.
6-46-1
Gaio F.
Mcgee J.
6-47-5
Pella G.[4]
Viola M.
6-46-2
Montanes A.[5]
Hernandez J.
3-67-656-3
Cervantes Huegun I.
Fabbiano T.
7-676-4
Andreozzi G.
Khachanov K.
6-43-67-62
Riba P.
Gombos N.[2]
6-41-66-3