Alexander Zverev vs Jan Lennard Struff — Heilbronn CH Semi-final

Heilbronn CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Alexander Zverev
GER5
Alexander Zverev
#2ATP
2100ELO
2051Clay ELO
$6.5MYTD
$66MCAREER
29 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 11 May 2015
clay
Jan Lennard Struff
GER2
Jan Lennard Struff
#41ATP
1694ELO
1659Clay ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Zverev A.
6-3 7-6
Struff J.
Zverev A.
6772
Struff J.
3620

Alexander Zverev defeated Jan Lennard Struff 6-3 7-6 in the Heilbronn CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Alexander Zverev came in ranked #2, leading the head-to-head 4–1. Alexander Zverev extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

Head to head

4–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-03-04Indian Wells MastersR32hardJan Lennard Struff6-3 6-1
2018-04-30MunichQFclayAlexander Zverev6-3 6-2
2018-04-16Monte Carlo MastersR16clayAlexander Zverev6-4 4-6 6-4
2017-05-01MunichQFclayAlexander Zverev3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5)
2016-04-18BarcelonaR64clayAlexander Zverev6-4 6-3
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zverev A.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Struff J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Zverev A.

Serve advantage — Zverev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Zverev A.Struff J.
63
Serve
—
59
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zverev A.Struff J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Even
69%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Even
8.5
8.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zverev A.Struff J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
94
61
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
90
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
68
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
100
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Zverev A.Struff J.
Freshness·Dominant
45
71

Zverev A.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 148 games (7d) · Struff J.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Zverev A.[5]
Pella G.
6-17-67
Semi-finals
Pella G.
Nishioka Y.
6-06-1
Zverev A.[5]
Struff J.[2]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Pella G.
Beck A.
6-17-5
Nishioka Y.
Kovalik J.
6-36-4
Zverev A.[5]
Fratangelo B.
4-66-46-3
Struff J.[2]
Bachinger M.
3-66-36-3
R16
Beck A.
Kubler J.
6-36-2
Pella G.
Copil M.
6-26-3
Kovalik J.
Berrer M.
6-36-2
Nishioka Y.
Golubev A.[8]
7-54-67-5
Zverev A.[5]
Novikov D.
6-26-3
Fratangelo B.
Langer N.
7-607-5
Bachinger M.
Brands D.
6-37-67
Struff J.[2]
Albot R.
2-66-36-4
R32
Brands D.
Kravchuk K.
6-36-2
Copil M.
Choinski J.
7-667-5
Berrer M.
Berankis R.[3]
7-666-4
Beck A.
Dzumhur D.[1]
6-46-4
Kubler J.
Jahn J.
6-7126-47-5
Pella G.
Kamke T.[6]
7-657-5
Kovalik J.
Nedovyesov A.
7-636-4
Nishioka Y.
Sijsling I.
6-46-737-65
Golubev A.[8]
Authom M.
6-26-1
Zverev A.[5]
Zeballos H.
6-46-2
Novikov D.
Laaksonen H.
6-33-66-3
Langer N.
Moraing M.
6-36-4
Fratangelo B.
Brown D.[4]
4-67-57-61
Bachinger M.
Stepanek R.[7]
6-37-5
Albot R.
Millman J.
1-67-56-4
Struff J.[2]
Huta Galung J.
6-36-2