Adrian Ungur vs Radek Stepanek — Rome CH Round of 32
Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 4 May 2015
clay
Ungur A.6-3 6-7 7-6
Stepanek R.
Ungur A.
664772
Stepanek R.
377631
Adrian Ungur defeated Radek Stepanek 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Radek Stepanek came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Adrian Ungur claimed a first win over Radek Stepanek in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.
Key context
- Match story: Adrian Ungur closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.
Head to head
0–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-09-16 | Davis Cup WG PO: ROU vs CZE | RR | clay | Radek Stepanek | 6-3 6-2 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Stepanek R.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (112 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
21
64
Break points saved·Dominant
61
92
Break points won·Clear edge
23
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
29
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
34
74
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Draw
Semi-finals
Bedene A.[1]
Starace P.
6-46-3
Pavlasek A.
Cecchinato M.[5]
7-53-66-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Lajovic D.[3]
7-687-65
Krajinovic F.[5]
Cecchinato M.[4]
7-56-4
Quarter-finals
Bedene A.[1]
Daniel T.[6]
6-26-4
Starace P.
Edmund K.[4]
6-46-4
Cecchinato M.[5]
Ungur A.
6-36-4
Pavlasek A.
Brown D.[2]
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Montanes A.[8]
7-56-1
Lajovic D.[3]
Riba P.
4-66-36-2
Krajinovic F.[5]
De Bakker T.
6-16-3
R16
Edmund K.[4]
Berrettini M.
6-36-3
Bedene A.[1]
Authom M.
6-16-2
Daniel T.[6]
Fabbiano T.
7-622-66-4
Starace P.
Martin A.
6-04-67-62
Cecchinato M.[5]
Rublev A.
6-16-4
Ungur A.
Cachin P.
6-36-4
Pavlasek A.
Ymer E.[8]
6-26-4
Brown D.[2]
Delic M.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
Volandri F.
6-04-66-1
Delbonis F.[1]
Di Meo G.
6-26-0
Montanes A.[8]
Marti J.
4-67-626-3
Lajovic D.[3]
Viola M.
6-26-0
Riba P.
Ignatik U.
2-66-16-3
Cecchinato M.[4]
Naso G.
2-66-46-1
Krajinovic F.[5]
Fucsovics M.
2-67-56-1
De Bakker T.
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-35-76-3
R32
Daniel T.[6]
Melzer G.
7-622-63-0
Martin A.
Molchanov D.
6-46-0
Cachin P.
Khachanov K.
1-66-26-2
Brown D.[2]
Cipolla F.
6-26-2
Fabbiano T.
Sonego L.
3-66-16-0
Bedene A.[1]
Baldi F.
7-676-1
Authom M.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-33-66-2
Edmund K.[4]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
6-36-3
Berrettini M.
Mertl J.
6-46-2
Starace P.
Kravchuk K.[7]
7-623-66-1
Cecchinato M.[5]
Marcora R.
7-56-2
Rublev A.
Trungelliti M.
7-646-3
Ungur A.
Stepanek R.[3]
6-36-747-63
Ymer E.[8]
Mecir Jr M.
3-66-16-1
Pavlasek A.
Travaglia S.
7-56-4
Delic M.
Arnaboldi A.
7-646-3
Marti J.
Mager G.
7-55-76-2
Viola M.
Carballes Baena R.
3-67-666-1
Riba P.
Cipolla F.
6-36-2
Ignatik U.
Daniel T.[7]
6-26-4
Volandri F.
Zekic M.
6-26-0
De Bakker T.
Bonadio R.
6-06-2
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Gaio F.
6-36-2
Cecchinato M.[4]
Martin A.
6-16-4
Delbonis F.[1]
Giustino L.
6-16-4
Di Meo G.
Tsitsipas S.
6-46-4
Montanes A.[8]
Giannessi A.
2-66-36-2
Lajovic D.[3]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
6-17-62
Cervantes Huegun I.[6]
Berrettini M.
6-36-4
Naso G.
Caruso S.
6-36-2
Krajinovic F.[5]
Cachin P.
6-36-1
Fucsovics M.
Hemery C.
6-26-0