Adam Pavlasek vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava — Ostrava CH Semi-final

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CZE
Adam Pavlasek
31 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2015
clay
ESP3
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Pavlasek A.
6-4 5-7 7-5
Munoz de la Nava D.
Pavlasek A.
6572
Munoz de la Nava D.
4751

Adam Pavlasek defeated Daniel Munoz de la Nava 6-4 5-7 7-5 in the Ostrava CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Adam Pavlasek came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Pavlasek A.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Munoz de la Nava D.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Pavlasek A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pavlasek A.Munoz de la Nava D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pavlasek A.Munoz de la Nava D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
13
Break points saved·Even
64
61
Break points won·Clear edge
35
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
26
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Cervantes Huegun I.
Pavlasek A.
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Pavlasek A.
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
6-45-77-5
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[8]
6-33-67-5
Quarter-finals
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[8]
Kovalik J.
7-56-4
Pavlasek A.
Pouille L.[1]
6-47-63
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Podlipnik Castillo H.
7-56-1
Cervantes Huegun I.
Martin A.[6]
6-46-4
R16
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[8]
Bourgue M.
6-07-5
Pavlasek A.
Authom M.[5]
4-66-26-3
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Couacaud E.
6-36-1
Pouille L.[1]
De Greef A.
7-56-4
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Djere L.
7-616-4
Kovalik J.
Delic M.[4]
6-27-5
Martin A.[6]
Cachin P.
6-16-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ward J.[2]
6-46-2
R32
Podlipnik Castillo H.
Ignatik U.
6-757-56-2
De Greef A.
Pospisil J.
5-77-636-3
Pavlasek A.
Rikl P.
6-37-5
Djere L.
Panfil G.
6-26-1
Bourgue M.
Brunner P.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Fabbiano T.
6-16-756-1
Martin A.[6]
Mertl J.
6-36-4
Cachin P.
Mertens Y.
6-36-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Kellovsky D.
6-16-1
Couacaud E.
Molchanov D.[7]
7-56-3
Ward J.[2]
Lojda D.
7-54-66-4
Pouille L.[1]
Kolar Z.
6-37-5
Authom M.[5]
Torebko P.
6-14-66-3
Munoz de la Nava D.[3]
Michalicka M.
6-42-67-62
Ramirez Hidalgo R.[8]
Mecir Jr M.
6-17-5
Delic M.[4]
Poljak D.
6-26-4