Matthew Ebden vs Lukas Lacko — Taipei CH Round of 16

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Matthew Ebden
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 April 2015
hard
SVK4
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Ebden M.
7-5 6-3
Lacko L.
Ebden M.
762
Lacko L.
530

Matthew Ebden defeated Lukas Lacko 7-5 6-3 in the Taipei CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Lacko came in defending last year's quarter-final. Matthew Ebden extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Matthew Ebden closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-17NewportR16grassMatthew Ebden6-1 7-6(2)
2014-06-09Queen's ClubR64grassLukas Lacko7-6(10) 5-7 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ebden M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ebden M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ebden M.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.2
7.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ebden M.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
45
26
Break points saved·Even
86
86
Break points won·Clear edge
32
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
58
33
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
34
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Groth S.[2]
Kravchuk K.
6-756-47-63
Semi-finals
Kravchuk K.
Ebden M.
6-737-647-64
Groth S.[2]
Bhambri Y.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Groth S.[2]
Ito T.[5]
6-27-64
Kravchuk K.
Lu Y.[1]
7-644-67-5
Ebden M.
Marchenko I.[7]
6-36-4
Bhambri Y.
Soeda G.[3]
6-43-66-3
R16
Kravchuk K.
Harrison R.[6]
0-1
Groth S.[2]
Smith J.
7-637-62
Ito T.[5]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Lu Y.[1]
Niki T.
6-16-3
Ebden M.
Lacko L.[4]
7-56-3
Marchenko I.[7]
Kudla D.
6-07-5
Bhambri Y.
Wang J.[8]
6-36-1
Soeda G.[3]
Barton M.
6-736-36-4
R32
Moriya H.
Myneni S.
5-2
Barton M.
Wang C.
6-36-2
Soeda G.[3]
Ho C.
6-26-0
Ito T.[5]
Nielsen F.
6-26-3
Niki T.
Matsui T.
4-67-656-3
Wang J.[8]
Ramanathan R.
2-66-37-64
Ebden M.
Corrie E.
6-46-2
Lu Y.[1]
Chen T.
7-666-2
Kravchuk K.
Jung J.
6-757-56-3
Harrison R.[6]
Yi C.
6-36-4
Lacko L.[4]
Klein B.
6-36-4
Kudla D.
Hung J.
6-26-4
Marchenko I.[7]
Udomchoke D.
6-37-5
Bhambri Y.
Kibi Y.
6-14-66-3
Smith J.
Yu C.
6-46-3
Groth S.[2]
Zhang Z.
7-636-4