Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Julia GoergesFed Cup WG SF: RUS vs GER Round Robin

Fed Cup WG SF: RUS vs GER · WTA · Round Robin
41 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 18 April 2015
clay
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWWL
Kuznetsova S.
6-4 6-4
Goerges J.
Kuznetsova S.
662
Goerges J.
440

Svetlana Kuznetsova defeated Julia Goerges 6-4 6-4 in the Fed Cup WG SF: RUS vs GER round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Svetlana Kuznetsova came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Svetlana Kuznetsova extended the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

43
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-22DohaR64hardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-3 6-3
2016-02-15DubaiR32hardJulia Goerges6-0 6-1
2014-01-27PattayaR16hardJulia GoergesDEF
2013-01-07SydneyR32hardSvetlana Kuznetsova3-6 6-3 6-3
2012-02-20DubaiR32hardJulia Goerges2-6 7-6(2) 6-4
2009-08-31US OpenR128hardSvetlana Kuznetsova6-3 6-2
2007-02-26DohaR16hardSvetlana Kuznetsova7-5 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Kuznetsova S.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Goerges J.

Goerges J.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kuznetsova S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
45%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
79
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
81
86
Break points won·Dominant
89
60
Deciding sets·Slight edge
85
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About