Ruben Bemelmans vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin — Le Gosier CH Final

Le Gosier CH · CHALLENGER · Final
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 31 March 2015
hard
FRA
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLWW
Bemelmans R.
7-6 6-3
Roger-Vasselin E.
Bemelmans R.
7862
Roger-Vasselin E.
6630

Ruben Bemelmans defeated Edouard Roger-Vasselin 7-6 6-3 in the Le Gosier CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Edouard Roger-Vasselin came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ruben Bemelmans claimed a first win over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardEdouard Roger-Vasselin6-3 6-7(5) 2-6 7-5 11-9

Serve vs return

This season
Bemelmans R.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Roger-Vasselin E.

Roger-Vasselin E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bemelmans R.Roger-Vasselin E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.5
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bemelmans R.Roger-Vasselin E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
16
22
Break points saved·Slight edge
87
82
Break points won·Clear edge
7
20
Deciding sets·Even
17
21
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
9
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Bemelmans R.
Roger-Vasselin E.
7-666-3
Semi-finals
Roger-Vasselin E.
Edmund K.
6-26-3
Bemelmans R.
Cunha H.
6-06-2
Quarter-finals
Bemelmans R.
Ghem A.
6-36-2
Roger-Vasselin E.
Jasika O.
6-46-2
Edmund K.
Paire B.[3]
3-66-26-3
Cunha H.
Smith J.
6-46-4
R16
Roger-Vasselin E.
Baghdatis M.[1]
6-26-2
Cunha H.
Klec I.
7-636-2
Paire B.[3]
Hernych J.
4-66-27-69
Jasika O.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-4
Edmund K.
De Schepper K.[7]
6-47-5
Bemelmans R.
Rochette L.
7-606-3
Ghem A.
Gonzalez M.[4]
6-03-67-5
Smith J.
Gombos N.[6]
3-66-46-1
R32
Klec I.
Andujar P.[2]
7-621-0
Cunha H.
Mina G.
3-66-36-3
Ghem A.
Horansky F.
6-26-4
Jasika O.
Chung H.[5]
6-32-66-4
Trungelliti M.
Elias G.
7-6106-3
Baghdatis M.[1]
King D.
7-57-63
Roger-Vasselin E.
Marie J.
7-656-1
Paire B.[3]
Middelkoop M.
6-46-4
Hernych J.
Koolhof W.
6-36-3
Edmund K.
Martin F.
6-46-736-4
De Schepper K.[7]
Krueger M.
6-46-1
Bemelmans R.
Mahut N.[8]
7-666-3
Rochette L.
Hemery C.
7-636-1
Gonzalez M.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-37-5
Gombos N.[6]
Barrere G.
6-37-63
Smith J.
Van Der Duim A.
7-626-4