Kimmer Coppejans vs Roberto Marcora — Guangzhou CH Final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Kimmer Coppejans
BEL
Kimmer Coppejans
#199ATP
1544ELO
1469Hard ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWLWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 March 2015
hard
ITA
Roberto Marcora
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLL
Coppejans K.
7-6 5-7 6-1
Marcora R.
Coppejans K.
78562
Marcora R.
66711

Kimmer Coppejans defeated Roberto Marcora 7-6 5-7 6-1 in the Guangzhou CH final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Kimmer Coppejans came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 5–7 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Coppejans K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Marcora R.

Marcora R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Coppejans K.

Serve advantage — Coppejans K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Coppejans K.Marcora R.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Coppejans K.Marcora R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
44
30
Break points saved·Slight edge
67
78
Break points won·Dominant
29
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
58
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
43
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Coppejans K.Marcora R.
Freshness·
76
—

Coppejans K.: 3 days rest · 4 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Coppejans K.
Marcora R.
7-665-76-1
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.
Chung H.[2]
6-42-66-2
Marcora R.
Fucsovics M.
7-636-796-4
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Lamasine T.
2-66-36-2
Marcora R.
Zhang Z.
6-31-66-1
Fucsovics M.
Setkic A.
6-23-66-4
Chung H.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-07-64
R16
Setkic A.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-1
Zhang Z.
Becker R.
6-26-3
Marcora R.
Thompson J.
6-47-63
Fucsovics M.
Devvarman S.
6-06-756-1
Coppejans K.
Sugita Y.[6]
4-66-37-65
Lamasine T.
Ghem A.
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Wang C.
6-37-5
Chung H.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-27-61
R32
Ghem A.
Kudryavtsev A.[4]
6-4
Zhang Z.
Kavcic B.[1]
6-16-3
Becker R.
Ignatik U.
6-23-67-66
Marcora R.
Millman J.[5]
6-21-66-2
Devvarman S.
Nedovyesov A.[3]
6-27-66
Fucsovics M.
Chen T.
6-36-4
Setkic A.
Wu D.
6-756-26-2
Moriya H.[7]
Middelkoop M.
5-77-666-0
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Cox D.
6-32-66-4
Thompson J.
Zheng W.
6-06-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Li Z.
6-47-64
Coppejans K.
Mitchell B.
6-27-62
Lamasine T.
Ghedin R.
6-26-3
Wang C.
Watanuki Y.
6-06-1
Munoz de la Nava D.
Torebko P.
6-46-4
Chung H.[2]
Myneni S.
5-76-46-4