Marton Fucsovics vs Ti Chen — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marton Fucsovics
HUN
Marton Fucsovics
#78ATP
1756ELO
1719Hard ELO
$550kYTD
$8.7MCAREER
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 March 2015
hard
TPE
Ti Chen
42 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLWLW
Fucsovics M.
6-3 6-4
Chen T.
Fucsovics M.
662
Chen T.
340

Marton Fucsovics defeated Ti Chen 6-3 6-4 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ti Chen came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fucsovics M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Chen T.

Chen T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Fucsovics M.

Serve advantage — Fucsovics M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Fucsovics M.Chen T.
23
Serve
—
72
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Fucsovics M.Chen T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.3
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 104). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fucsovics M.Chen T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
73
14
Break points saved·Dominant
97
39
Break points won·Dominant
65
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
39
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fucsovics M.Chen T.
Freshness·
92
—

Fucsovics M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Coppejans K.
Marcora R.
7-665-76-1
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.
Chung H.[2]
6-42-66-2
Marcora R.
Fucsovics M.
7-636-796-4
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Lamasine T.
2-66-36-2
Marcora R.
Zhang Z.
6-31-66-1
Fucsovics M.
Setkic A.
6-23-66-4
Chung H.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-07-64
R16
Setkic A.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-1
Zhang Z.
Becker R.
6-26-3
Marcora R.
Thompson J.
6-47-63
Fucsovics M.
Devvarman S.
6-06-756-1
Coppejans K.
Sugita Y.[6]
4-66-37-65
Lamasine T.
Ghem A.
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Wang C.
6-37-5
Chung H.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-27-61
R32
Ghem A.
Kudryavtsev A.[4]
6-4
Zhang Z.
Kavcic B.[1]
6-16-3
Becker R.
Ignatik U.
6-23-67-66
Marcora R.
Millman J.[5]
6-21-66-2
Devvarman S.
Nedovyesov A.[3]
6-27-66
Fucsovics M.
Chen T.
6-36-4
Setkic A.
Wu D.
6-756-26-2
Moriya H.[7]
Middelkoop M.
5-77-666-0
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Cox D.
6-32-66-4
Thompson J.
Zheng W.
6-06-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Li Z.
6-47-64
Coppejans K.
Mitchell B.
6-27-62
Lamasine T.
Ghedin R.
6-26-3
Wang C.
Watanuki Y.
6-06-1
Munoz de la Nava D.
Torebko P.
6-46-4
Chung H.[2]
Myneni S.
5-76-46-4