Roberto Carballes Baena vs Daniel Cox — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Roberto Carballes Baena
ESP8
Roberto Carballes Baena
#165ATP
1632ELO
1592Hard ELO
$188kYTD
$6.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 March 2015
hard
GBR
Daniel Cox
35 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLWLW
Carballes Baena R.
6-3 2-6 6-4
Cox D.
Carballes Baena R.
6262
Cox D.
3641

Roberto Carballes Baena defeated Daniel Cox 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Carballes Baena R.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cox D.

Cox D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Carballes Baena R.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Carballes Baena R.Cox D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.3
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 70). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Carballes Baena R.Cox D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
30
Break points saved·Dominant
93
52
Break points won·Dominant
58
27
Deciding sets·Even
64
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
50
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Carballes Baena R.Cox D.
Freshness·
93
—

Carballes Baena R.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 12 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Coppejans K.
Marcora R.
7-665-76-1
Semi-finals
Coppejans K.
Chung H.[2]
6-42-66-2
Marcora R.
Fucsovics M.
7-636-796-4
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.
Lamasine T.
2-66-36-2
Marcora R.
Zhang Z.
6-31-66-1
Fucsovics M.
Setkic A.
6-23-66-4
Chung H.[2]
Carballes Baena R.[8]
6-07-64
R16
Setkic A.
Moriya H.[7]
6-36-1
Zhang Z.
Becker R.
6-26-3
Marcora R.
Thompson J.
6-47-63
Fucsovics M.
Devvarman S.
6-06-756-1
Coppejans K.
Sugita Y.[6]
4-66-37-65
Lamasine T.
Ghem A.
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Wang C.
6-37-5
Chung H.[2]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-27-61
R32
Ghem A.
Kudryavtsev A.[4]
6-4
Zhang Z.
Kavcic B.[1]
6-16-3
Becker R.
Ignatik U.
6-23-67-66
Marcora R.
Millman J.[5]
6-21-66-2
Devvarman S.
Nedovyesov A.[3]
6-27-66
Fucsovics M.
Chen T.
6-36-4
Setkic A.
Wu D.
6-756-26-2
Moriya H.[7]
Middelkoop M.
5-77-666-0
Carballes Baena R.[8]
Cox D.
6-32-66-4
Thompson J.
Zheng W.
6-06-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Li Z.
6-47-64
Coppejans K.
Mitchell B.
6-27-62
Lamasine T.
Ghedin R.
6-26-3
Wang C.
Watanuki Y.
6-06-1
Munoz de la Nava D.
Torebko P.
6-46-4
Chung H.[2]
Myneni S.
5-76-46-4