Kei Nishikori vs Milos Raonic — Davis Cup WG R1: CAN vs JPN Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: CAN vs JPN · ATP · Round Robin
#717ATP
1714ELO
1680Hard ELO
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWL
3 — 2
Sets
Friday, 6 March 2015
hard
Nishikori K.3-6 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-4
Raonic M.
Nishikori K.
366263
Raonic M.
634642
Kei Nishikori defeated Milos Raonic 3-6 6-3 6-4 2-6 6-4 in the Davis Cup WG R1: CAN vs JPN round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Kei Nishikori came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Kei Nishikori extended the head-to-head to 5–2.
Key context
- Match story: Kei Nishikori dropped the opening set before beating Milos Raonic 3–6 6–3 6–4 2–6 6–4.
Head to head
4–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-01-04 | Brisbane | SF | hard | Milos Raonic | 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) |
| 2014-09-29 | Tokyo | F | hard | Kei Nishikori | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 |
| 2014-08-25 | US Open | R16 | hard | Kei Nishikori | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 |
| 2014-06-23 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Milos Raonic | 4-6 6-1 7-6(4) 6-3 |
| 2014-05-04 | Madrid Masters | R16 | clay | Kei Nishikori | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) |
| 2012-10-01 | Tokyo | F | hard | Kei Nishikori | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-0 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
68%
82%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.7
16.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.2
3.8
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
89
68
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Dominant
74
13
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
90
Tiebreaks·Even
97
97
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About